Wisam Mohammed Abed Alqaraghuli Generative AI is a technology that can create new content, such as text, images, or music, by learning from existing data. Think of it as a creative robot that has studied thousands of books, articles, or artworks and can now generate new content that looks or sounds like it was created by a human.
Now, let's discuss the implications of this technology in content creation and copyright:
Content Creation: Generative AI can be a powerful tool for content creators. It can help writers come up with ideas, generate drafts, or even assist in creating visual content like images or videos. For example, if you're writing an article on a complex topic, generative AI can suggest relevant information and help you structure your thoughts.
Quality Improvement: It can also be used to enhance the quality of content. AI can help proofread and suggest improvements in grammar and style. This can be a great aid for beginners and experienced writers alike.
Automation: Businesses can use generative AI to automate content generation for routine tasks like product descriptions, news summaries, or social media posts. This saves time and resources.
Now, let's talk about the emotional aspect. As a researcher, I have witnessed the excitement and concerns surrounding this technology. On one hand, it opens up new possibilities for creativity and efficiency. On the other hand, there are concerns about the potential misuse of AI-generated content, including copyright issues.
I feel a sense of wonder at what AI can achieve, but also a responsibility to ensure that it is used ethically and responsibly.
Wisam Mohammed Abed Alqaraghuli. This is an emerging area of discussion that is already being mulled by stakeholders.
There are six different license types, according to Creative Commons (https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/cclicenses/), all of which require attributes to be given to the content creator. Gen AI does not (at the moment) provide any source attribute. To be fair, Gen AI programs don't create new content but rather juxtapose bits of content based on freely available information on the Internet.
Two key questions then follow:
(1) Are generative AI able to access published papers (under any sort of cc license)
(2) Or Are they only able to access papers under less restrictive licenses like CC-BY, CC BY-SA
The answers to these questions will reveal even deeper issues; who are the real guardians of scientific knowledge? Should Gen AI be allowed to access predatory journals (fake science)?
"'Works Containing Material Generated by Artificial Intelligence' makes it clear that works created by AI without human intervention or involvement still cannot be copyrighted. The policy explains, however, that a work containing AI-generated material may contain sufficient human authorship to support a copyright claim."