Speaking of AI, here's ChatGPT 4o's answer to your question:

Similarities:

Differences:

Conclusion:

While both AI-enabled advanced mechatronics systems and intellectualized cyber-physical-social-human systems share technological foundations and goals of improving automation and intelligence, their scope and focus differ significantly. Mechatronics systems excel in specialized mechanical and electronic tasks, while CPSHS strive to create holistic systems that integrate technology with human and social contexts.

My roughly two years of experience is that anything that current GAI (not AGI) mechanisms can produce does not go beyond what is typical for popular science or professional textbook level, and their insightfulness, scholarly novelty, prognostication power, and academic significance cannot be matched with the trend-setting knowledge of domain experts. Thus, they may be informative for the general public but do not contribute new knowledge to that possessed by front-line scientists. This comes from the underpinning data processing mechanisms. Due to the retrospective nature, the support of scholarly projection, prediction, envisioning, inception, and so forth, is largely restricted and delimited. The question intended to explore what distinguished scientists can share about the specific outcomes of recent deep-going analytic and comparative studies, as opposed to interlinked contents of Internet repositories. What are the very recently discovered and yet unpublished ontological, disciplinary, technological, and praxiological differences and similarities?