Look at these papers on 'hiatal surface area'

All the best

Ewen

Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4337-46. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3069-2. Epub 2013 Jul 23.

Laparoscopic repair of hiatal hernias: new classification supported by long-term results.

Grubnik VV1, Malynovskyy AV.

Author information

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Mesh repair may decrease the recurrence rate but bears risk of esophageal complications. This study aimed to analyze the long-term results of laparoscopic hiatal repair depending on hiatal surface area (HSA).

METHODS:

The results from 658 procedures were analyzed. Group 1 had 343 patients with HSA smaller than 10 cm(2) (small hernias), for whom primary crural repair was performed. Group 2 had 261 patients with HSA size 10-20 cm(2) (large hernias), for whom primary crural repair (subgroup A) or mesh repair (subgroup B) was performed. Group 3 had 54 patients with HSA larger than 20 cm(2) (giant hernias), for whom only mesh repair was performed.

RESULTS:

The mean follow-up period was 28.6 months (range, 10-48 months). Primary repair results in a higher recurrence rate for large hernias (11.9 %) than for small hernias (3.5 %) (p = 0.0016). For large hernias, the original method of sub-lay lightweight partially absorbable mesh repair provides a lower recurrence rate than primary repair (4.9 % vs 11.9 %; p = 0.0488) and a comparable dysphagia rate (2.1 % vs 2.2 %; p = 0.6533). For giant hernias, mesh repair results in a higher recurrence rate than for large hernias (20 % vs 4.9 %; p = 0.0028). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) HSA recurrence ratio confirmed the correctness of the chosen threshold levels (10 and 20 cm(2)) for subdividing hernias into three classes according to the new classification.

CONCLUSIONS:

The authors advise routine measurement of HSA and use of relative classification, primary suturing as the optimal repair for small hernias, the original technique of sub-lay lightweight partially absorbable mesh repair as the apparent best treatment for large hernias, and the original technique for giant hernias, which provides results corresponding to those reported in the literature, although these results require improvement.

Comment in

Hiatal surface area as a basis for a new classification of hiatal hernia. [Surg Endosc. 2014]

Hernia. 2014 Dec;18(6):883-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-012-1033-z. Epub 2013 Jan 6.

Predictability of hiatal hernia/defect size: is there a correlation between pre- and intraoperative findings?

Koch OO1, Schurich M, Antoniou SA, Spaun G, Kaindlstorfer A, Pointner R, Swanstrom LL.

Author information

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Closure of the esophageal hiatus is an important step during laparoscopic antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the preoperatively determined hiatal hernia size and the intraoperative size of the esophageal hiatus.

METHODS:

One hundred patients with documented chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. All patients had been subjected to barium studies before surgery, specifically to measure the presence and size of hiatal hernia. The size of the esophageal hiatus was measured during surgery by calculating the hiatal surface area (HSA). HSA size >5 cm(2) was defined as large hiatal defect. Patients were grouped according to radiologic criteria: no visible hernia (n = 42), hernia size between 2 and 5 cm (n = 52), and >5 cm (n = 6). A retrospective correlation analysis between hiatal hernia size and intraoperative HSA size was undertaken.

RESULTS:

The mean radiologically predicted size of hiatal hernias was 1.81 cm (range 0-6.20 cm), while the interoperative measurement was 3.86 cm(2) (range 1.51-12.38 cm(2)). No correlation (p < 0.05) was found between HSA and hiatal hernia size for all patients, and in the single radiologic groups, 11.9 % (5/42) of the patients who had no hernia on preoperative X-ray study had a large hiatal defect, and 66.6 % (4/6) patients with giant hiatal hernia had a HSA size

Thank you Dr Griffiths.

Thank you Dr Deepraj 

I appreciate your help.

Regards,

Carlos Madalosso