One case is the standardization of identification methods of bibliographic entities (eg DOI) or responsibilities (eg ORCID) and the other is bibliographic ontologies that facilitate the automatic analysis of bibliographic data (eg SPAR [http://www.sparontologies.net/]). Next week I will publish an English-language articles about it in my RG project:

"PLOS ONE – a case study of citation analysis of research papers based on the data in an open citation index (The OpenCitations Corpus)"

See also the long-standing standards: MARC21, Dublin Core, etc.

Los gestores bibliograficos son muy utiles asi como los estilos bibliograficos depende de la técnica en la descripción bibliográfica

Hi,

It seems that MARK tags.

Here are components of an academic bibliographic record:

ISBN:

0393013804

Notes:

Bibliography: p. 324-330.

Includes index.

Subjects:

Evolution (Biology)--History. Natural selection--History.

LC Classification:

QH361 .G66 1980

Dewey Class No.:

575.01/62.