There are some confusion over the use of SCM and ISCM as most companies assumed those disciplines applications are the same practice. If that the case, then how efficient could that be for the logistics and manufacturing companies?
If we translate the word "integrated" from previous context like Computer Integrated Manufacturing (CIM), it means a substantial use of ICT to "integrate" all the phases and states of a SC in order to manage it more effectively and efficiently.
Besides several "commercial" declarations few vendors provide a complete ISCM environment and less companies implemented it in a whole.
Anyway situation is evolving very fast and vendors as well companies are getting some benefit from this "integration".
I can suggest you to read something on: www.scmfocus.com
Hi Flavio. Thanks for the enlightening answer. I believe there could be more than that as it involves various of interfaces elements when integrating the process supply system and other operational activities.
The word interfaces is now famously being used since the engagement of the word integrated (I believe so...). What's your opinion on this?
I just gave you my personal view to your question. Of course if you look at the different "interfaces" multiple perspectives are possible. The question should at this point be reformulated specifying differently the two words "integrated" and "practised" in the context of your specific interest: such as integrating upstream suppliers in designing/engineering, or similar ...
Integration and Interfaces are related since you can systematically integrate two distinct entities trough a specified interface. That's why they are often used together.