Food for thoughts:
Voting complacency theory and extreme democratic outcomes/temporary authoritarianism movements, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for them to come to exist under an independent rule of law system?
Any ideas?
Note: This is an academic question, not a political one.
In voting complacency theory and authoritarianism, the necessary and sufficient condition for power access under a rule-of-law system is exploiting widespread voter disengagement—when citizens stop holding leaders accountable, authoritarian actors can consolidate authority while formally operating within legal structures, eroding democracy incrementally.
That is a good an answer AI can give as they are not good at specific questions or yes or no answers and a simple why.
The question is WHAT IS THE NECESSARY AND SUFFICIENT CONDITION? Do you or AI knows?
- Badges
- Science topic