There is a necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to come to power under majority rule based democracy and rule of law when competing in elections; and there is a necessary and sufficient condition for exism movement to lose power when going through reelection.
Exism movements like Trumpism, Brexism, Brazilianism and Italianism came to power under the same condition to gain power; and both Brazilianims and Trumpism lost power when seeking reelection under the same condition to lose power, Trumpism fell in 2020 and Brazilianism fell in 2022.
And this leads to the question: Under majority rule and the independent rule of law, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to lose power?
What do you think?
This is an academic question, please provide your own comments, not third party comments
Good day Pavel.
If that is a serious answer, can you please expand it to link it to why trumpism fell in 2020 and Brazilianism fell in 2022 when competing for re-election?
On the other hand, I assume you have an idea about the necessary and sufficient conditions for exism movements to come into power like Brexit, Usexit, Brazilexit, and Italexit.
If you expand your answer, I will reply.
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
This phrase cited from V.I.Lenin https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_situation
Of course, instead word 'Revolution" need to read 'Crash', in details for both of the crisis ivents not the same. Reasons the same and consequences was the same.
Good day Pavel, I see it was not your view and it is not linked to the nature of this question/democracy under the rule of law
Do you have your own views on the answer to this specific question?
Under majority rule based democracies and the independent rule of law, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to lose power?
Respectfully yours;
Lucio
Hello, its my own view based on analisys of the situation discussed.
Pavel, so for you ""When the highs can't and the lows won't" is a necessary and sufficient condition, FOR what?
I belive it is monetary issues that bring exism to power. But again, one man's exism is another man's Napoleon. It took the electorate a while to respond to the 'financial crash' of 2007-8. America was first out of the trap, followed by our Brexiters. Europe is now on the tail end of the, Sweden, Italy, for certain. France is on the block - but managing to stay centre right.
Obviously Hungary, Turkey, Russia, and those on the fringes of the imperialist 1st World economics have had a seesaw thing going on for quite some time.
Unfortunately, the exism of the left has yet to manifest in those 11st world places. Although the UK came close with Corbyn came close.
it is necessary to define "exism" before embaring on a serious discussion
Jeffrey, good day. Thank you for writing.
Are you familiar with exism movements like Brexism, Brazilianism, and Trumpism? The question is about how these movements lose power when going for reelection under the independent rule of law system and the majority rule based democratic process.
Thank you for what seems to be what you belive to be examples of the concept. But what I asked for was a definition of "exism" as is customary when discussing, introducing or using a concept. I am as many other observers familiar with the political situations associated with your examples but something more is needed to define, or answer questions about, "exism movements".
Jeffrey, good day.
This is not a discussion, it is a technical question that assumes you read the context of this question and familiar with what is written out there.
Are you familiar with my work on normal demcratic outcomes and extreme democratic outcomes or normal liberal democracy and extreme liberal democracies, and the role of chaos?
You can find it in research gate or academia.
It seems you missed my last post I specifically referred to the answer to your question - I wrote I am as many other observers familiar with the political situations associated with your examples but something more is needed to define, or answer questions about, "exism movements".
I have not read your work but if it contains a definition of "ëxism"it may be better to repeat it here to enable a better answer to your question and contribute to your research from those whose expertise in politics and political science is in other areas than yours. This is one of the postive functions of the Researchgate question and answer construction.
Good day Jeffrey, if you are thinking inside the box, you may not be able to see the answer to this question, you need to be able to think outside the box to understand the nature and working of exism movements within democratic contest....Just defining exism will not help you much.....I think you need to read more of what is out there....However, the definition used in my publications is below:
All my publications related to this question directly or indirectly have a list of operational concepts relevant to each question.....
In one of the article EXISM is defined as concept No. 30
30) EXISM, the extreme democratic movements aiming at destroying majority rule based institutions, locally and globally.
Now that you have the concept, the context is: There is a necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to come to power under majority rule based democracy and rule of law when competing in elections; and there is a necessary and sufficient condition for exism movement to lose power when going through reelection. Exism movements like Trumpism, Brexism, Brazilianism and Italianism came to power under the same condition to gain power; and both Brazilianims and Trumpism lost power when seeking reelection under the same condition to lose power, Trumpism fell in 2020 and Brazilianism fell in 2022.
And this leads to the question: Under majority rule and the independent rule of law, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to lose power?
What do you think?
This is an academic question, please provide your own comments, not third party comments
And the question is: Under majority rule based democracies and the rule of law, what is the necessary and sufficient condition for exism movements to lose power?
What do you think?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Bioecology
- Systems Ecology
- Landscape Ecology
- Connectivity