Yes Daniel - as Gerhard rightly hints - some will more than happily 'ride on your coat-tails'. That person will have 'consciously' made the decision to accept that they are the author when mistakenly invited by RG - even if they are not - so they are unlikely to respond to you knowing this. You can 'follow' them on RG which will then allow you to message them directly.
to my experience, when contacting the researchgate people via appropriate internal RG channels or via E-mail, you will after a while (up to some days) get some kind of a ticket number and an anwers via E-mail that things are picked up and will further be processed....
That's a very interesting topic and lesson to learn.
I don't know yet how to handle the same problem and hopefully, that will not happen to me. Thank you so much, Sir Daniel Michael Strickland and kind regards.
Dear Daniel Michael Strickland, if you follow the advice by Dean Whitehead and Gerhard Martens you should be able to solve this problem. In my experience, the RG team normally answers after a few days. Did you check Google Scholar and Scopus as well?
Dear Daniel Michael Strickland, yes, definitely! In my personal experience, Scopus provides the most reliable results. Google Scholar often shows significantly more citations than RG and Scopus.
Frank, I checked SCOPUS. The other author doesn't even show up on an author search. I tried with various versions of her first name, including just the first initial.