Here are a few quick points that can be found in this type of experiment (at territorial or organizational level):

Education and informed decision-making: for a truly autonomous democracy to function effectively, the population must not only be well-informed, but also capable of critically assessing complex political issues. This places high demands on education systems, and presupposes a relatively high level of political commitment on the part of all citizens. It also requires access to transparent and free information.

Balancing majority rule and minority rights: democracies must protect the rights of minorities, even if their opinions are not shared by the majority. In a self-governing democracy, safeguards would be needed to ensure that the majority cannot encroach on the fundamental rights of minority groups.

Practical implementation: the sheer logistics of involving every citizen in every decision could be overwhelming. Solutions could involve technology or representative systems such as sortition, but these raise other problems linked to digital culture and the random nature of representation. It also requires skills. There are many powerful mechanisms for self-management. They can be found in the field of sociocracy, as well as in liberated companies... But it requires a high level of understanding of process mechanisms and facilitation skills.

Disparity of resources and influence: even in a self-managed system, there is a risk that the wealthiest or most influential individuals will influence the opinions of others, leading to unequal power dynamics. Mechanisms would be needed to guarantee equal access to information and equal influence in decision-making.

Ensuring representation and inclusion: creating a system that truly includes all voices, especially those traditionally marginalized or under-represented, is a major challenge. This goes beyond formal rights and includes substantial opportunities for participation and influence.

Finally, there is a cultural heritage to consider. The answer cannot be universal and needs to be contextualized.

The sovereignty of citizens is a critical aspect that is sometimes overlooked in the design and functioning of democratic systems. Democracy, at its core, is based on the principle of popular sovereignty, which asserts that the ultimate power and authority rest with the people. However, in practice, the sovereignty of citizens is often undermined or neglected.

One reason for this neglect is the prevalence of representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. While representative democracy has proven to be an effective and practical form of governance, it can lead to a gap between the citizens and their elected officials. This gap can result in a lack of direct participation and a diminished sense of ownership over the decision-making process.

Another factor contributing to the neglect of citizen sovereignty is the influence of special interests and powerful elites. In many democratic systems, there are often vested interests, such as corporate entities or lobby groups, that exert significant influence over the political process. This influence can sway policy decisions and create a power imbalance, diminishing the voice and sovereignty of ordinary citizens.

Furthermore, the complexity of modern governance and policymaking can make it challenging for citizens to engage meaningfully in the democratic process. The language used in legislation, the intricacies of policy formulation, and the bureaucratic machinery can create barriers that deter citizens from actively participating and exercising their sovereignty.

To address these issues and ensure the sovereignty of citizens is upheld, it is essential to promote transparency, accountability, and civic education. Governments should strive to provide accessible information about policy decisions and involve citizens in the decision-making process through mechanisms such as public consultations, participatory budgeting, and citizen assemblies. By actively involving citizens, governments can enhance their understanding of citizens' needs and aspirations, leading to more inclusive and responsive policies.

Additionally, efforts should be made to reduce the influence of special interests in the political system. This can be achieved through campaign finance reforms, stricter regulations on lobbying, and transparent mechanisms for tracking and disclosing political donations. By limiting the undue influence of powerful elites, the sovereignty of citizens can be better protected.

Furthermore, civic education plays a crucial role in empowering citizens to understand their rights, responsibilities, and the mechanisms of democratic governance. By promoting civic education in schools, communities, and through public campaigns, individuals can develop the necessary skills and knowledge to actively engage in the democratic process, exercising their sovereignty effectively.

In conclusion, while democratic systems aim to uphold the sovereignty of citizens, there are challenges and shortcomings that can lead to its neglect. By promoting transparency, accountability, civic education, and reducing the influence of special interests, we can strive to enhance citizen sovereignty and foster a more vibrant and inclusive democracy. It is imperative that democratic design and practice continually evolve to ensure that citizens' sovereignty remains at the heart of the political process.