Suppose a bibliometric analysis was conducted to uncover new research discoveries, but it was later discovered that similar research had already been carried out. In such a scenario, what would be the appropriate course of action to pursue?
- Shall we update the time intervals?
- Should we update and rewrite both the findings and the article?
Please help with this, thanks in advance.
Ghadah Marie
I think that updating the biometrical statistics is of importance due to the type of study it is concerned with.
1 votes
1 thanks
Reduan Ahmad
If recent studies are found to bias a bibliometric analysis, updating the time intervals is a reasonable step. Depending on the impact, both findings and the article may need rewriting for accuracy. Transparency about any changes made is crucial.
1 votes
1 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Filing
More Md Al Mustanjid's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions