The concept of "circular economy-based capitalism" involves a form of business and consumption that aims to reduce waste, make efficient use of materials, and increase recycling. , reuse, and re-conversion. Within this framework, the application of capitalism in this fashion may pose some threats to Marxism, but it should not be seen as a full-blown 'tsunami'. Potential threats may include:

Integration into the system: The circular economy can be considered a variation of capitalism, and as such, it can integrate elements of sustainability and social justice into the existing system, weakening debates about an alternative socioeconomic system such as Marxism.

Socio-Political: The development of a circular economy could lead to reconciliation between opposing political and social factions, reducing the need for new economic and social systems.

However, it should be noted that:

Adopting a circular economy does not necessarily overthrow Marxism; The two systems can exist in parallel or even interact with each other.

The main challenge for the circular economy is to change consumption and production patterns, which is a complex and lengthy process, and it is not certain that it will completely replace Marxism or other systems. other economic.

Therefore, one should not expect a 'tsunami' that directly threatens Marxism, but the adoption of circular economy-based capitalism could impact the debates and strategies of future Marxist group.

The concept of "circular economy-based capitalism" involves a form of business and consumption that aims to reduce waste, make efficient use of materials, and increase recycling. , building a sustainable economic ecosystem. However, the application of this model is unlikely to lead to a "tsunami" of many separate threats to Marxism. The following factors can clarify the nature of the two systems and the relationship between them:

Goal: Circular economy-based capitalism focuses on integrating sustainable strategies for companies and entire economic systems, while Marxism values fair distribution and social control over productive resources.

Approach: The circular economy seeks to solve environmental and resource problems in a market way, while Marxism proposes a socialist economic system in which ownership and control productive resources are given to society.

Efficiency debate: Critics of Marxism argue that capitalist economic systems, including models such as the circular economy, are more efficient and generate more benefits than with the socialist economic system. While supporters of Marxism believe that their system will create a more equitable and less unequal society.

Based on these points, the adoption of capitalism based on a circular economy does not necessarily lead to a "tsunami" of various threats to Marxism. Instead, the two systems may be having an ongoing philosophical, economic, and social debate about how best to manage the economy and distribute resources.

The adoption of capitalism based on a circular economy could pose many different types of threats to Marxism in the future. Here are some possible threats:

Enhanced inequality: A circular economy could increase inequality in society, causing some classes of the wealthy to become richer while the poor may experience harder times. This can lead to social imbalance and inequality, one of the issues that Marxism is concerned with.

Strengthening the power of capital: A circular economy can strengthen the power of businesses and the capitalist class, giving them more control and influence in society. This could upset the balance of power and pose a threat to Marxism, which holds that power should be distributed more equitably in society.

Unfair competition: In a circular economy, competition between businesses can become more fierce, leading to unfair practices such as falsifying information and threatening market monopoly. , and abuse of power. This can cause problems of fairness and transparency, going against the basic principles of Marxism.

Environmental challenges and sustainable development: A circular economy can pose major challenges to the environment and sustainable development, making environmental protection and ensuring sustainable development more difficult. so it's more difficult. This can conflict with Marxist values of protecting the environment and ensuring the rights of future generations.

In short, adopting capitalism based on a circular economy can create many different types of threats to Marxism in the future, including inequality, strengthening the power of capital, unfair competition, and environmental and sustainable development challenges.

Dear Trung thank you for commenting. Linear economy based capitalism/traditional market thinking had a social sustainability gap and an environmental sustainability gap, but since in 1848 when Karl Marx came out with the red marxism idea the environmental issue was not a critical issue so he used the social sustainability gap as a point of entry to flip capitalism thinking from economic freedom without equality to social equality without freedom.

In 1987 when the WCED advised us to go sustainable development thinking to leave fully socially and environmentally unfriendly economies behind.....we are now back to instead of linear traditional economies circular economies, with social and environmental sustainability gaps still embedded in them as going from linear to circular does not fixed the embedded sociall and environmental unfriendliness as social issues and environmental issues ARE EXTERNAL FACTORS to traditional economic thinking, be it linear or circular.

The existence of social and environmental sustainability gaps means that the circular economy will face red marxism treats or green marxism threat or yellow marxism threats each using the specific sustainability gap they need as point of entry and flip.

So if going circular is part of pretending to be socially and environmentally friendly and the social and environmental sustainability gap get worse and worse as the circular market expands as expected, then the threats will become if not reality, real pressure points for paradigm shift to higher level models like green market, red markets, or sustainability markets.

Time will tell.

Thank you for commenting

Lucio