The question of whether the law related to crimes should apply equally to adults and minors is complex and deeply rooted in legal, psychological, and sociological considerations. Minors are generally treated differently under criminal law because they are considered less culpable due to their incomplete cognitive development, lack of maturity, and higher potential for rehabilitation. However, as juvenile crimes become more frequent and violent—such as the recent case in Spain where three minors killed a social worker—there is growing debate over whether juvenile justice systems should impose harsher penalties, especially for repeat offenders or particularly heinous crimes. While some argue that minors should face stricter punishments as a deterrent, others stress that the focus should remain on rehabilitation rather than retribution, given that young offenders often come from environments marked by trauma, neglect, or societal failures. Additionally, the rise in juvenile violence raises concerns about underlying factors such as family dynamics, economic hardship, exposure to crime, mental health issues, and the influence of social media, which can desensitize minors to violence and glorify criminal behavior. Social media, in particular, has been linked to peer pressure, normalization of aggressive behavior, and easy access to harmful content, potentially shaping young minds in dangerous ways. While the legal system must ensure public safety and hold minors accountable, it also has a duty to address the root causes of youth crime and provide effective intervention programs. Instead of simply increasing the severity of punishment, a multi-faceted approach—combining education, mental health support, stricter monitoring of juvenile offenders, and responsible digital exposure—is necessary to prevent minors from spiraling into a life of crime. The ultimate challenge lies in striking a balance between accountability and rehabilitation, ensuring that justice is served while also giving young offenders a chance to reform.

This is a complex issue, one that blends legal, social, and psychological considerations. When it comes to crimes committed by minors, there’s a delicate balance between justice and rehabilitation. I believe the law should apply differently to adults and minors, but that doesn’t mean it should be lenient. Minors are still in the process of developing emotionally and psychologically, and their ability to fully understand the consequences of their actions is often underdeveloped. The law must recognize this difference. However, there is also the pressing reality that some minors are committing increasingly violent and often premeditated crimes, as we saw in the tragic case in Spain. The violence among younger people is escalating, and the severity of the crimes is concerning.

What should the law do in such cases? The answer is not simple. While minors should be given a chance for rehabilitation, the law must also protect society. There are situations, especially with repeated offenses or extreme violence, where harsher measures are necessary. Some argue that if a minor can commit a crime as severe as murder, they should be treated in a way that holds them accountable, though still allowing for a focus on their ability to reform. However, this shouldn’t be done at the cost of their future potential for rehabilitation. The law should take into account the individual’s history, mental state, and potential for change, but there should also be consequences that show the gravity of their actions.

The question of why minors are becoming more violent is also crucial. Social media has undoubtedly played a role, creating environments where violence, aggression, and negativity can be amplified. But it’s not just social media; broader social issues—like family dynamics, economic hardship, lack of guidance, and exposure to violence—also contribute. The modern world’s challenges are impacting young people in ways that were not as prevalent before. We need to consider all these factors when determining the right approach to minors who commit crimes.

I reckon the law related to crimes should not apply equally to adults and minors, but that doesn’t mean minors should get away lightly either. I believe the law needs to recognize that minors are still developing mentally and emotionally, so their capacity for judgment and impulse control is different from adults. However, when minors commit serious or repeated violent crimes, like in the tragic case you mentioned from Spain, I think the justice system has to strike a balance, holding them accountable while also providing rehabilitation opportunities.

I also believe the increasing violence among minors is a symptom of deeper social problems. Social media might play a role by amplifying aggression or desensitizing young people, but it’s probably only one part of a bigger picture involving family issues, education gaps, and community failures. So rather than just harsher laws, I reckon we need better prevention, support, and early intervention to really address why minors are becoming more violent. Simply treating them as adults under the law risks ignoring these root causes and might even worsen the problem in the long run.