To me any subject has it's own philosophy and is directly linked with the philosophy of other all subjects. The tremendous development of one sciences means there are some negligence in the other, proper balancing of them is urgently needed for the survival of human in this nature.
Dear colleague! In each field of science, including the natural sciences, there are disciplines associated with the history and methodology of this science. In my opinion, this is one of the main ways.
There is interdependency in all spheres of life. This is way the early natural/appled scientists did strived to understand social sciences. Even crimals like John Edward H. Rulloff (1819 –1871) managed to be a doctor, lawyer, photographer, inventor, carpet designer,phrenologist, and philologist, in addition to a career criminal and serial killer [ http://www.wikizero.biz/index.php?q=aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvRWR3YXJkX0guX1J1bGxvZmY]. Rullof defended himself in court properly despite being a doctor.
Sir. Newton and others also strive to be all round as this promotes creativity and wider brain development.