This is a question about the event horizon shielding a singularity...
The information loss paradox can be stated neatly as follows: if one throws a book into a black hole, all that comes out is blackbody radiation or chaotic radiation, the information contained in the book is lost forever. This is a paradox because quantum theory states that the information of the initial state should never disappear.
In order to resolve this paradox it is necessary to construct microscopic states of the black hole and to give a statistical-mechanical explanation for the black hole entropy, which is difficult within general relativity because of the no-hair theorem. So far the paradox still remains since a complete description of an evaporating black hole has not yet been established,
Naively it would seem that if the book is thrown out across our event horizon, you only need to wait for the cosmic expansion to bring the book back inside our event horizon. Then there would not be any information loss paradox.
Experiments to test Ferent Gravitation theory vs Einstein Gravitation theory!
In the double slit experiment the interacting observer is an instrument, detector…
My experiment (I can not do this experiment in Romania): if you replace the detector with a piece of metal the wave will collapse (in Einstein Gravitation theory the wave will not collapse, only travels through warped spacetime) into a particle because of my theory photon – graviton interaction:
Ferent equation for photon – graviton interaction:
E = h × f + a × f - a × ν
where - a × ν is the negative energy of the graviton
ν is the frequency of the graviton
Here we know the frequency of the photon f and the frequency of the graviton f. With different metals we have different frequencies of the graviton ν.
A lot of experiments can be done, and will result a lot of data!
Ferent gravitation theory explains the double slit experiment!
The electromagnetic wave is the superposition of 3 sinusoids; this means the electromagnetic wave will be collapsed by the presence of an electric field, of a magnetic field, of a gravitational field, by another electromagnetic wave…
In my electromagnetic theory, gravity does collapse quantum superpositions, gravity bends light because light has 3 sinusoids, has a gravitational sinusoid!
In Maxwell electromagnetic theory, gravity does not collapse quantum superpositions, gravity does not bend light, because light has only 2 sinusoids!
So decoherence is due to the gravitational field, for example to the gravitational waves generated by the observer in the double-slit experiment.
To understand if they exist, I think we have first to understand what a black hole really is. Is it a singularity? I don't think so. Physically unlikely-absurd. Are they celestial bodies with escape velocity ALMOST equal to c? Yes. Very probable. They would in any case appear black! Why do I say "almost" near to c? Because otherwise the black hole would be like an object traveling at c. Impossible. It should be massless. But then how could it swallow all that mass?! And you get the paradox! You get it by considering the singularity and the escape velocity at c.
I think both hypothesis are wrong.
Depending on the answer we give to the "black question" we have different scenarios which let arise different hypothesis about white holes. Also, the exit of what absorbed by a black hole could be in the blackhole itself. Why then don't we observe it? Well, the absorbed matter could be decomposed in its finest components (finer than quarks), space's quanta for example. Something we can't detect yet. And here is the other main problem. How to detect white holes? What would they expel? Light? Matter? Neutrinos? Space's quanta? Do we have instruments able to detect that?