I like to use other words and think this is serious.
I think on all imaging techniques is must be standardized and have common output (quantitative results) to be really useful in personalized medicine. Of course one can keep it simple, what you see is what you trust and what you base your diagnosis on. In PET CT already since appr 2003 a standardization started on using SUV , later on with EARL initiatives all scanners regardless of make and age and scanning methodology can be aligned. This now is true by carefully using monte carlo based modelling techniques and proper calibration for SPECT CT's of all makes (since 2000). Our company Hermes offers this technology and has provided much proof on various isotopes since 2014. Even aligned 12 camera's at different sites in Finland to provide standard output MBq/voxel. From there you can take it into Dosimetry for eg Lu which we do too. Feel free to start a personal discussion, your question is RELEVANT! Peter
For your information, provided below are the Japanese diagnostic reference levels set by J-RIME (Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure) .
The Japanese diagnostic reference levels for the adult CT scanning in terms of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) are as below, assuming body weight of 50–60 kg (except for 50–70 kg for the coronary artery scanning).
85 mGy for the head (plain routine)
15 mGy for the chest (single phase)
18 mGy for the chest to pelvis (single phase)
20 mGy for the upper abdomen to pelvis (single phase)
For your information, the Japanese diagnostic reference levels for the adult CT scanning in terms of dose length product (DLP) are as below, assuming body weight of 50–60 kg (except for 50–70 kg for the coronary artery scanning).
1350 mGy cm for the head (plain routine)
550 mGy cm for the chest (single phase)
1300 mGy cm for the chest to pelvis (single phase)
1000 mGy cm for the upper abdomen to pelvis (single phase)