Recently, I met a young researcher that insisted on the statement that position control for mobile robotics (ground and aerial) is already solved with many working solutions and that the real research lies in the estimation (pose estimation), specially in UAVs. Do you agree with this statement?

If not, please write bellow the reasons you think that there is for the continuity of mobile robot motion control research. Which areas there are for improvement? What are the technical reasons for continuing researching these solutions?

More Tiago P. Nascimento's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions