I have got a comment from a reviewer and do not know how to address it:
The authors have revised the manuscript well, but I'm still unsure about the data collection period. This study collected data in 2013-2014 which means about 9-10 years ago. And we know conditions have changed a lot after the pandemic, and the authors need to justify that this research is still applicable. The justification given is still quite dubious to me. Maybe you can include references that support that the data is still valid and reliable for analysis in your study.
Would you please mind suggesting how to respond to this comment?
Hi,
I think he/she gave a big guideline by stating this,
" Maybe you can include references that support that the data is still valid and reliable for analysis in your study."
So, in my opinion, you need to find similar published works or websits that support the idea of his comment.
Hello Fazli Haleem, what is your data concerning? what ailment? physical health, mental health, infectious diseases, non communicable diseases? Maybe you can include some references about the specifics of how the pandemic altered the topic you are discussing. The Australian public health assoc. of Aust. group had a covid conference, addressing issues. Regards
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Statistics
- Probability
- Probability Theory
- Reliability