You may find my answers strange, but what researchers foolishly forget is the skewing of the data when the "observer" fails to see their own participation. Practitioners in the field also have to include themselves as part of the landscape in the midst of the meta-analysis.
This observer-participatory dynamic should also be considered in terms of the way researchers artificially make exclusions in categories of religion and the question of who belongs to the university.
A religious person should have a positive impact on employees behaviour but not every religious person is necessarily a good, ethical and moral person. I believe that a spiritual person of any religion has an intrinsic understanding of moral values and moral compass as employees or leaders.