"i10 Index" is an indicator that could be approached by other bases (only Google Scholar) , since it indicates the number of publications with at least 10 citations. I find it interesting to express an indicator with a lower quote, but which suggests a greater leveling of the analysis. What do you think occurs?

A) i10 Index is a poor indicator of quality

B) i10 Index is an indicator of Google and that other bases do not understand to be relevant

C) i10 Index is an indicator that values volume more than quality.

D) None of the above (if possible, try to explain).