In many countries, surveys are carried out with certain frequency that measure the population's perception regarding a certain issue. In Mexico, for example, they are widely used to measure indices of perception of violence in states and municipalities and with this the most and least unsafe are defined. Can these types of tools be considered sufficient for the design of accurate indicators and, above all, for the generation of public policies and institutional programs?
Public perception surveys have indeed been conducted by several countries to see public perception on several issues. And are still effective to see the accuracy of government policies, both when they are going to be implemented, when they are implemented and after they are implemented. All have a correlation to see the effectiveness, impact and public opinion as one of the objects of government policies or programs. If we want to enrich the study and strengthen the accuracy of a public perception, we can add several other aspects besides surveys to be considered. For example, the environmental side of the community (which is the object of the survey) where they live, the character of the community, and socio-economic conditions. This can be an additional consideration to eliminate bias that may occur from the results of the public survey.
@Jihan Marsya Azahra
Kindly follow me. This will enable me reach you out.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science
- Research Topics