The new institutional tools should build on the institutional assumptions that Adam Smith laid out in the Wealth of Nation. People are questioning the gains from Free Trade. Unequal distribution was alway disturbing. While capital has become fairly mobile in the global economy, labor is sluggish at best, and perhaphs not yet mobile. Specialization and technological advance are now constrained by environmental problems. In the sense that we do as yet fully accomodated the new directions those institutional assumptions should take, they should be on the top of the list of consideration for emerging economies.
When Smith's institutional assumptions are combined with his natural and psychological assumptions, we get hitchless growth. You can look up Schumpeter's "History of Economic Thought" on this. If the institutional assumptions are constrained in the direction I indicated, then growth becomes hitched, which makes stationary or sustainable growth, or even decay possibile.