Mysticism and Evil: Exploring Rumi’s Perspective on the Nature of Good and Evil

The True Nature of Evil and Mysticism: A Rumi Perspective

Evil has long been a subject of philosophical, theological, and ethical debates. From a conventional standpoint, evil is often understood as an antithesis to good: an inherent moral defect or cosmic disorder that disrupts harmony. However, Islamic mysticism, particularly the teachings of Jalal ad-Din Rumi (1207–1273), presents a more nuanced perspective that challenges binary moral distinctions. Rumi, a Sufi poet and philosopher, perceives evil not as an autonomous force but as an instrument within divine wisdom meant to facilitate spiritual growth and self-realization. This essay explores Rumi’s approach to evil, how it reconciles with contemporary ethical dilemmas, and whether mysticism can profoundly understand human struggles.

Rumi’s Mystical Interpretation of Evil

Rumi’s perception of evil is deeply rooted in Sufi metaphysics, where existence is seen as a manifestation of divine reality (Schimmel, 2011). In Mathnawi, he frequently uses parables and metaphors to illustrate that what is perceived as evil may be an aspect of divine wisdom. For instance, he likens evil to the bitterness of medicine, an unpleasant experience necessary for healing (Chittick, 2007).

Evil as a Test of Spiritual Growth: According to Rumi, suffering and apparent evil are catalysts for self-discovery and transformation. He writes, “Do not grieve. Anything you lose comes round in another form” (Rumi, trans. Barks, 1995). This suggests that loss and hardship, often deemed evil, are veiled blessings intended to deepen spiritual awareness.

Non-Dualism and Divine Unity: Rumi moves beyond the simplistic dualism of good versus evil. He argues that everything, including what we call evil, is part of God’s grand design. Evil is thus not an independent reality but rather an aspect of a greater good that human perception cannot always comprehend (Nasr, 2007). He echoes the Quranic assertion: “Perhaps you dislike a thing, and it is good for you” (Qur’an 2:216).

The Role of the Ego (Nafs): Rumi attributes much of human suffering to the ego or nafs, which blinds individuals from recognizing divine wisdom in hardships. He emphasizes the necessity of surrendering to divine will, arguing that resisting pain or suffering only prolongs agony (Helminski, 2000).

Rumi’s mystical perspective offers a transcendental reconciliation with evil but is not without critique. Several counterclaims challenge the practicality and ethical implications of his views:

Moral Relativism and the Danger of Complacency: One argument against Rumi’s view is that it risks moral relativism—if all evil is merely an aspect of divine wisdom, does this justify inaction against injustice? Critics argue that such a stance could lead to passivity in the face of oppression (Knysh, 2017).

Human Agency and Accountability: A purely mystical perspective might undermine human responsibility for ethical actions. The Quran emphasizes moral accountability (Qur’an 4:79), suggesting that evil is not merely an illusion but often the consequence of human free will. If all suffering is perceived as a divine tool for growth, does it absolve perpetrators of violence from responsibility?

The Problem of Extreme Suffering: Rumi’s metaphorical interpretation of evil may not satisfy extreme suffering, such as genocides or natural disasters. Critics argue that a poetic approach does not adequately address victims' deep psychological and existential despair (Frank, 2018).

Rumi’s approach remains relevant despite these critiques, particularly in addressing contemporary ethical dilemmas and psychological well-being.

Mysticism as a Source of Resilience: Studies in psychology and spirituality suggest that mystical perspectives like Rumi’s can enhance resilience. Viewing suffering as meaningful rather than arbitrary can help individuals cope with trauma and adversity (Van Cappellen et al., 2016).

Balancing Mysticism with Ethical Action: Rumi emphasizes surrender but does not advocate for passivity. Many Sufi scholars interpret his teachings as a call for inner jihad—the struggle against one’s lower self. This aligns with the idea that mystical understanding and ethical responsibility can coexist (Chittick, 2007).

The Paradox of Free Will and Divine Wisdom: Rumi acknowledges human free will but sees it as interwoven with divine orchestration. This view aligns with compatibilist philosophies, arguing that divine determinism and human agency coexist without contradiction (Nasr, 2007).

Mysticism’s Contribution to Understanding Human Struggles

In addition to philosophical debates, Rumi’s teachings offer a practical spiritual framework for navigating pain and moral complexities. His perspective provides a way to integrate suffering into a meaningful narrative rather than seeing it as chaotic or purposeless.

Spiritual Healing and Self-Realization: Mystical traditions, including Rumi’s teachings, emphasise self-awareness as a path to healing. Individuals can cultivate more profound compassion and wisdom by embracing suffering as a transformative experience (Helminski, 2000).

Interfaith and Ethical Dialogue: Rumi’s non-dualistic approach transcends religious boundaries, offering a common ground for interfaith discussions on morality and suffering. His works have been widely studied across different traditions, influencing contemporary spiritual thought (Schimmel, 2011).

Ethical Leadership and Social Justice: By integrating mysticism with action, leaders and activists can find a balance between striving for justice and maintaining inner peace. Figures like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. have drawn upon mystical traditions to inspire movements rooted in spiritual conviction and ethical responsibility (Knysh, 2017).

In synopsis, Rumi’s mystical interpretation of evil challenges conventional moral binaries, offering a vision where suffering and hardship serve a higher purpose. While critics argue that such a perspective risks moral relativism and passivity, Rumi’s philosophy encourages self-transformation and deeper understanding. In a world grappling with ethical dilemmas, suffering, and existential crises, mysticism provides a profound alternative to conventional frameworks, inviting humanity to see beyond apparent contradictions and embrace the more profound wisdom of existence.

References

Chittick, W. C. (2007). Sufism: A Short Introduction. Oneworld Publications.

Frank, R. M. (2018). Al-Ghazali and the Problem of Evil. Oxford University Press.

Helminski, K. (2000). The Knowing Heart: A Sufi Path of Transformation. Shambhala.

Knysh, A. (2017). Sufism: A New History of Islamic Mysticism. Princeton University Press.

Nasr, S. H. (2007). The Garden of Truth: The Vision and Promise of Sufism, Islam’s Mystical Tradition. HarperOne.

Schimmel, A. (2011). Mystical Dimensions of Islam. University of North Carolina Press.

Van Cappellen, P., Toth-Gauthier, M., Saroglou, V., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2016). ‘Religion and well-being: The mediating role of positive emotions’, Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), pp. 485-505.

Qur’an 2:216, Qur’an 4:79.

Is this stockwork?

Is presence of normative rutile of same importance if they are not seen optically in volcanic or plutonic rock of any caution for aTiO2 in Ti-in-Zr T?

Can one use available spreadsheets to determine redox condition of anhydrous ferroan granites (A type granite) through Ce zircon/melt lattice strain?

Can I get concordant ages from discordant lead isotope data?

Does sodic metasomatism have effect on zircon composition and concentric zoning in peralkaline granites? How can I describe the CL image?

What is the significance of normalized value of mineral chemistry data?

1. What can cause contamination/alteration of Na-Amphibole around Wolfranite ore (Scheelite) in alkaline granite? 2. I think this grain is titanite?

Identification of accessory minerals ?

What is responsible for inclusions of feldspar in quartz and alteration of riebeckite?

What is/are the implication(s) of alteration of alkali feldspar to sericite?

Using OBD technique i am trying to measure laser induced shockwaves velocity i found that at start velocity increases and then decay?

How can I interpret the data without the need of solving it manually?

I am looking for the permission to use the OLBI survey. Does anyone know where I can obtain that information?

Why only alpha wave of brain are found in some patients?

How to interpret results of AST for Pseudomonas aeruginosa?

Does anyone know the scoring and interpretation for Psychological Birth Order Inventory (PBOI) of White Campbell?

Can you please interprete this analysis?

Correct statistical approach for a hermit crab shell exchange experiment?

Can a paper that is posted as a preprint in a database with DOI, can be reviewed in another journal and accepted for publication??

How to interpret a Low R squared and negativ adj. R on my fixed effects panel analysis?