As I mentioned above reviewer has asked me to make changes, like write down complete details about faults in the smart grid though my paper is about faults in transmission lines. My paper already has 12 pages if I add those irrelevant details it will increase the number of pages also. And another thing he has asked to merge all graphs which I think will make it too much complicated for reading. So how should I deny those changes which will not a kind of "offened" the reviewer?
I agree with Chilumba but you may try my suggestion:
1- Re-arrange your inclusion and exclusion criteria.
2- Re-order research design to analyze only included samples and data.
3- Show the topics of irrelevant data (as have been excluded) in a table which can not be analysed.
4- Expand your discusstion via suggesting how your irrelevant data need a another research to be included and analysed.
Just try to do everything the reviewer asks because it will make the process easier :)
Depending on the expertise and experience of your reviewer, he/she/they may see where 'faults in smarts grids' can help to explain your thesis (the position you are taking with regards to transmission line), especially in an era where technology continues to drive innovation at lightning speed. Accept the feedback with humility, review other papers in the area (especially more recent papers/publications), and adjust as needed. I wish you success.
Dr. Collette J-A Smith
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Chemistry
- Pharmacology
- Pharmaceuticals
- Drugs