The fragmentation of the challengers in Peru allows some relative stability for peruvian government. But it still being extremely fragmented? The contentious political actors ussually act separetly, but they are increasingly overcome the collective action problems and tend to syncronize their actions. The result... a considerable level of political instability. The only way to not reach a failed state, I think, lies at another degree of fragmentation in which the challengers found in some manner a permanent and not ephimeral organization, with a identified leader and the build of a consistent statement of their claims. Indeed the government have more instruments for acces to a better game of negotiations with not an "hidra" but with a more content political actor...