Hi all,
I'm writing a thesis on the Chinese Communist Party and its totalitarianism/political action in Hong Kong and its effect on the ability of MNCs to effectively continue operations in the region.
I'm attempting to write the methodology section and am stuck on which approach to move forward with. The thesis is qualitative (using interviews) but am unsure whether a grounded theory, phenomenology or constructivist approach would be most suited... I've also been looking into using an integrated approach, combining a grounded theory and phenomenology approach to gain a more holistic understanding.
Would anyone be able to help on the matter? would appreciate it.
Thank you
Choosing the appropriate methodology for your research can be a challenging task, but it's crucial to ensure that the methodology you choose aligns with your research objectives and the data you're collecting. Here are some suggestions that can help you determine the most suitable methodology for your research:
Grounded Theory: Grounded theory is a suitable approach when you want to develop a theory based on data collected from interviews or observations. This approach involves developing a theory that is grounded in the data collected, rather than pre-existing theories. If you plan to conduct interviews with individuals involved in MNCs in Hong Kong and want to develop a theory based on their experiences and perceptions of the Chinese Communist Party's actions, grounded theory could be an appropriate approach.
Phenomenology: Phenomenology is a suitable approach when you want to understand how individuals experience a particular phenomenon. If you plan to understand the experiences of MNCs operating in Hong Kong and how they perceive the impact of the Chinese Communist Party's actions on their ability to operate effectively, a phenomenological approach could be suitable.
Constructivism: Constructivism is a suitable approach when you want to understand how individuals construct their reality and the meanings they attach to their experiences. If you plan to explore how individuals involved in MNCs in Hong Kong construct their reality and perceive the impact of the Chinese Communist Party's actions on their ability to operate effectively, a constructivist approach could be suitable.
Integrated approach: An integrated approach that combines grounded theory and phenomenology could be suitable when you want to develop a theory grounded in data while also understanding the experiences of individuals involved in MNCs in Hong Kong. This approach could help you gain a more holistic understanding of the impact of the Chinese Communist Party's actions on MNCs operating in the region.
Ultimately, the most suitable methodology for your research depends on your research objectives and the data you collect. Consider the advantages and limitations of each approach and choose the methodology that best aligns with your research objectives and data collection methods. It may also be helpful to consult with your supervisor or a research methodology expert for further guidance.
É O CONTRÁRIO!
SE VC PRECISA ENTREVISTAR 20 PESSOAS PARA TENTAR DESCOBRIR FALHAS NOS ENSINAMENTOS DOS MAIS VELHOS PARA OS MAIS NOVOS, SÓ OOM PESQ QUALITATIVA!!! OU SEJA É A PESQUISA QUALITATIVA Q EXIGE VC TRABALHAR COMN OS SEUS PARES, ESSE MÉTODO QUALITATIVO, OUVINTE, ORAL É Q VAI FAZER SUAS PESQUISAS.
NÚMEROS, JAMAIS, NEM PENSE NELES!. EM CIÊNCIAS HUMANAS NÃO!
Hi, You may refer my papers on how to use grounded theory approach
A Qualitative Study On Mobile Number Portability-7th Amendment In Indian Telecom
A Study On The Impact Of Engagement With Service Channels And Factors Affecting Mobile Number Portability
A Qualitative Study On Service Channels In The Indian Telecom Industry
@Alexander Slater
In addition to what has been said by @Ajit Singh's, we rarely measure effectiveness in qualitative study so I will suggest you reframe your topic to look more qualitative, draft your research questions and from there you can deduce the appropriate theory and methodology needed to arrive at the answers to those questions.
Grounded theory can be difficult to create and can be time consuming for a student researcher. According to Alan Bryman, author of one of my favorite books on Social Research Methods, you would need to collect data more than once, test your hypothesis, then collect more data in other settings to substantiate a theory. I think that phenomenology can be useful in this context.
If you plan to use interviews, I would imagine you are seeking your subjects impressions and experiences. I like Bryman for his clear explanations of various approaches - which you can cite to justify your choices, of course. Here is his definition of phenomenology: ...concerned with how individuals make sense of the world around them and how in particular the [student] should bracket out preconceptions concerning his or her own grasp of that world.' There is a chapter on interviewing, another on qualitative data analysis, and one on writing up social research. You can find the TOC online and check it out (search "Alan Bryman Social Research Methods 6th edition Table of Contents").
Also - check your school library for other qualitative student papers in your field of study. Find out what other students did. This will not only give you resources (texts you can read and cite), but you will learn the methodology they chose, procedures they followed, and interview questions they used. Other papers provide a great template, although you must have your own rationale for your choices in your own context of course.
S. GALINDO ESTÁ CERTÍSSIMA, OUVIR O OUTRO, SE POR NO LUGAR DELE, E DEPOIS DE MUITAS ANÁLISES VC MESMO VAI SENTIR A HORA CERTA DEPARAR SENTAR E ANALISAR TUDO, PESQUISA, AUTORES QUE AJUDAM E O QUE VC SENTIU E SENTE AO ANALISAR DADOS QUALITATIVOS, INCLUINDO CLARO, O QUE LHE VEIO DE RESPOSTAS DOS OUTROS. O PESQUISADOR É VC, MAS A MATÉRIA A AVALIAR, VEIO DO JEITO DE OLHAR E SENTIR DE OUTRAS PESSOAS, SORTE ABS ANDRÉ SALES
Janet Ogungbire ESTÁ CORRETA. PRIMEIRO ESCLAREÇA O QUE VC QUER SABER, SUAS PERGUNTAS PARA AJUDAR A CIÊNCIA, O MÉOTODO OU METOTODOLOGIA É "DEDUZIDO" DEPOIS. É A PESQUISA QUE PEDE QUAL MÉTODOS, E NÃO, O CONTRÁRIO
Hi,
You may check my paper if you wish to go for grounded theory approach.
Regards
- Badges
- Science method
- Similar topics
- Methodology