see these papers, i hope it will be helpful for you.

http://www.columbia.edu/itc/hs/medical/heartsim/review.pdf

Article The Contractile Properties of Human Heart Muscle: Studies on...

http://www.uio.no/studier/emner/matnat/ifi/INF5610/h08/undervisningsmateriale/Mechanics.pdf

https://static1.squarespace.com/static/559921a3e4b02c1d7480f8f4/t/585c2c3e46c3c4b30abdf37e/1482435649586/Colon.pdf

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7123/bf3cdbe69126e63e1f5fc9b7fe7e920a05e5.pdf

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8c5c/6ea1d4ad02307991ed10f7e459020ea00c32.pdf

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cdc4/5dbb0a220da0e13eca23fb861483ece7c779.pdf

Thanks you so much Ola!

best

https://fundamental-research.ru/pdf/2015/1-10/38599.pdf

see this paper,

"Myocardial tissue elastic properties determined by atomic force

microscopy after stromal cell–derived factor 1a angiogenic therapy

for acute myocardial infarction in a murine model"

Dear Majid,

Go with stress, strains and EDP.

The biomechanical properties of myocardium, derived from ex vivo cadaver heart, might be different from in vivo properties due to tissue homeostasis.

The parameters required to estimate human myocardium are LV EDP of 10-13.6 mmHg (it depends on ex vivo and vivo) could be selected for the studies, fs and fn shear modes (shear stress and shear strains) can be calculated (generally in the range from 6 to 7 kPa for ex vivo whereas it was within the range from 1.2 to 1.8 kPa from in vivo) . These discrepancies might be due to the tissue homoeostasis in ex vivo conditions.

Comparison between true fibre strain and fibre stress (Cauchy stress); details of the slice position can be explained from your obtained figures. The arrow sign in zoom in boxes may show that the endocardium experiences high fibre stress for human ventricle whereas for pig, it starts after endocardium in posterior region of LV wall.

Refere this paper

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11517-017-1768

Hope it is helpful to you.

Ashish