I think time is not in geometrical form. Time is a independent variable

Dear Reza, Space and time are interrelated. So, there is a temporary entity in geometric shapes. But the best help to understand this question from Panagiotis Stefanides. He skillfully engaged in geometric shapes. Please, find his name in Research Gate, and ask.

In Newton's view of space and time, time is modeled as the real line with its standard metric. There is not much geometry to be found in his notion of time (it is really just a flow parameter for dynamics); geometry only resides in space. In the special and general theories of relativity, space and time form a Lorentzian manifold - space-time exhibits much subtle geometry. However, the 'proper time' of an observer is still modeled by (intervals contained in) the real line. The Newtonian and relativistic models of space and time are adequate to describe most phenomena of physics we are aware of. It is, of course possible, that, ultimately, they may have to be modified. At present, there do not appear to exist any precise ideas about such modifications, though.

There is a very interesting article about Newton's ideas on space and time due to Markus Fierz, which I would like to recommend to readers of my comment.

Dear Reza, I found one splendid manuscript. Please, have a look.

Professor Kulchitsky: Giving links to files that do not download is not helpful, at all!

Morning, Please try to open one more time. The title of this paper is:

A Journey to Poetry of Geometrical Shapes from the Ancient Time to Poetry of John Hollander

Mehrdad Moazami Goudarzi1*, Leila Baradaran Jamili2 and Bahman Zarrinjooee2

Journal of Novel Applied Sciences

Available online at www.jnasci.org

©2014 JNAS Journal-2014-3-7/771-776

ISSN 2322-5149 ©2014 JNAS

All the best, Vladimir

Thank you dear prof. Fröhlich and prof. Kulchitsky

Any changes caused by the change.

The time will be a geometrical shape.... because the principal axis the entire universe. Now, we say, according to previous knowledge and awareness of today knowledge of all scientists like Newton and Einstein, Lorentz and Schrödinger and even Kant, Avicenna and MullaSadra and theories such as the Big Bang and string theory, Beginning of the universe is formed by starting the time.

First, the time has started and with the time movement, and then movement of energy, space became widespread and Continued ... the universe was created.

This means that, for the presence of elementary particles and beginning of Big Bang, first suitable and proportional space for these have created until the particles would be have a place for creation, establishment and movement.

So, we'll have an idea: " The Time - Space will be a geometrical shape”.

Excuse me if I didn't have good sentences but I have a good purpose.

We can talk together about the geometrical shape of the time.

I agree. I prefer to discuss specific topics. Space and time are what unites the past, imperative, and future. We study the architecture of the populations of hippocampal neurons that control the process of remembering. In changing the geometric form of the nerve cells and populations far unexplained mechanism hidden information coding. All the best.

This question is very important! From my point of view, Time, algebra, logic, sequential 

thinking, etc. reside in left hemisphere, whereas, space, geometry, holistic perception, intuition, phantasy, etc, reside on the right hemisphere. Of course the mind works by utilising both hemispheres. In modern times however, we have seen a serious attempt to express everything in terms of left hemisphere, and especially algebra. Thus we have Algebraic topology, algebraic Geometry, and eve differential geometry has an algebraic  taste. It is unnatural to try to express everything in terms of one hemispherical mode!

Lately, geometric thinking gets a return!  It is again unnatural, although possible, to try to express "time" in terms of right hemisphere mode.

Historically, we started using the "diagrammatic" mode of ancient Greek Geometry, we passed to the algebraization of mathematics, and lately we come back to diagrammatic mode, an example of which is Category Theory.  An interesting exposition of this story is the book:

Danielle Macbeth, Realising Reason. A Narrative of Truth & Knowing. Oxford 2014.  

I remember some ideas of time in western philosophy.

Just try a rather Kantian idea. Time can be considered as belonging to humans. Men tend to organize the world in time and space. That in the end means that time and space are human and we can not look beyond, because we are human. Time is a condition of experience, which is more basic.

That time is not independent is an old idea in western philosophy. Remember Aristole who stated that time is only something that belongs to movement. It means it does not exist independently ( like quality does not exist without quantity). And in the measurement of time the problem still exists, because we conclude on time out of movements of watches or the speed of light.

Another interesting point of view is that time is unreal, e.g. because the concepts we use of 'before and later' one one hand and 'past, present and future' on the other hand do not really fit (see MacTaggert). 

Thinking time as geometrical form depends on visualization, where usually on the left is the past and on the right is the future. But that is nothing more like a metaphor, that can be useful to organize observations in physics, chemistry and biology as well as in history but that does not imply that time is independent from the observer or the observers mind and that it 'really' has a shape.

Nietzsche tried an alternative approach to the widespread linear models of time. He considered time as a circle (shape) in the sense of an eternal recurrence. 

Regards Thomas

What is "geometrical form"? Can we say that "geometrical form" is just a structure in algebraic terms? Let us take a circle C in the monitor of a computer. Actually I was to depict a sphere. So let us take functions f:T---->C. these functions actually are "variable elements" of C, and T represents "time". If f is a great circle, and continuo to draw many such great circles, then a sphere is revealed. These variable elements, as relations of T and C define a structure. In general in Category Theory, any arrow

f:T--->A, can be regarded as "variable element", where T is considered as time domain. As you see we can give time a more general meaning than the usual one. I hope that i demonstrated that time is present in  geometrical forms! 

Dear prof. Drossos

This is a very interesting idea (f: T-----> A)

With research on different function in circuits model system(CMS) we’ve got a great and interesting idea:

Time is a polymorphism process that moves from point to a full circle.

I hope we can soon prove this hypothesis in terms of the geometric model.

To form a geometric shape - it takes time. And vice versa. Time to be measured.

I do not see what I call  real time in any way related to geometry.

The real yet idealised geometry is that of three dimensional objects or their collections in space with idealised shapes in one and 2 Dimensions. There is no 1D or 2D objects let alone 4 D ones.

On the other hand, one may combine a time axis on an xt plot and observe geometric shapes. But this is an arbitrary mapping - an abstraction instantiated as a graphical image to our senses . One can map the temperature in different cities and show isotherms - geometric shapes, but one cannot claim temperature to be a geometric form. Its the locus of a common property distributed among the object replicate geometry of the collection of objects having the property of a particular value. In particuar an abstraction of clocks existing and synchronised in all ponderable locations is what we call time and this gives the illusion of it being related to geometry, but it is nothing different than abovementioned relation of geometry and temperature. It is necessary to distinguish mathematical abstractions from reality.