My answer is yes. Because there are some unanswered questions or complex concepts in modern physics. The questions that modern physics does not have answers for, and the physicists believe that it is due to the inability of theories. So we should reconsider the relativistic Newton's second law, and to combine classical mechanics, quantum mechanics and relativity.
http://gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Essays/View/5518
Dear Hossein,
There is an element of simplicity and an element of confusion in your question.
On one hand there is a philosophical belief that Physics as constructed is capable of a complete description, and, on the other hand a strong belief that the assumptions that are behind the modern physics are fulfilled to provide such a description. On both issues the answer is that we do not know, and there is a strong suspicion is that it cannot be the case. Physics as a construct is an approximation of something that we consider exist and is describable. When this condition is taken into consideration there never be a complete description and any and every approach is needed to improve what we have. Fortunately, the methodology of modern science created a set of conditions for such a theory to be an advancement. If the "theory" (by this we consider math description) should provide at least one new explanation for existing phenomena and one new prediction that is experimentally testable. This is somewhat of a conundrum. We are not sure that Math is the only language capable of doing that and additionally that the present construct of math is a complete mapping of what we are describing. There is an additional caveat that as Einstein liked to remark "only theory defines what is measurable". Of course there is a need for new descriptions. Propose one that other people embrace and we all are better off.
Dear Boguslaw
Thank you for you interesting mentions. Let me start my comment with a quote of Max Planck, he said;"Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve." I have accepted that there is not a complete theory in theoretical physics, and never we can provide a theory without any unanswered question. So, our trying and research is based on develop the present theories. When a theory reaches unanswered questions, it will need to develop, like the Big Bang theory that developed by inflation. There is some unanswered questions and complex concepts beyond the my question. A long years my researches show that we should reconsider the relativistic Newton's second law to solve some of unanswered questions.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Quantum Physics
- Quantum Mechanics