The 30-item Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWAS) is widely used to measure authoritarianism (Altemeyer, 1998). The scale measures a social attitude dimension that incorporates conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, and authoritarian submission. There is also a 15-item short form of the measure available (Zakrisson, 2005). The scale is often used in combination with a measure of social dominance orientation (SDO; the degree to which a person generally supports a system of group based hierarchy), and together they have been found to be strong predictors of various forms of prejudice, ethnocentrism, and homophobia. You might be particularly interested in a study by Cross et al. (2010), which examined RWA and SDO in a sample of supporters of gifted education (researchers, teachers, gifted-talented trainers). 

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.

Cross, J. R., et al. (2010). Maximizing student potential versus building community: An exploration of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and preferred practice among supporters of gifted education. Roeper Review, 32, 235-248.

Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872.

Enter some other search words, Kamil: e.g., teacher-pupil relationships; pupil behaviour; authoritarian reachers. As both a solo and a co-author, I have written articles on teacher -pupil relationships. These are downloaded on research gate publications. Whether or not they are relevant to your particular research question, I don't know. But feel free to have a look. Check them out under:

Stephens, P.;

Bru, Stephens & Torsheim;

Kyriacou & Stephens,

etc.

Best wishes, Paul

The 30-item Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale (RWAS) is widely used to measure authoritarianism (Altemeyer, 1998). The scale measures a social attitude dimension that incorporates conventionalism, authoritarian aggression, and authoritarian submission. There is also a 15-item short form of the measure available (Zakrisson, 2005). The scale is often used in combination with a measure of social dominance orientation (SDO; the degree to which a person generally supports a system of group based hierarchy), and together they have been found to be strong predictors of various forms of prejudice, ethnocentrism, and homophobia. You might be particularly interested in a study by Cross et al. (2010), which examined RWA and SDO in a sample of supporters of gifted education (researchers, teachers, gifted-talented trainers). 

Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality”. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 47-92.

Cross, J. R., et al. (2010). Maximizing student potential versus building community: An exploration of right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and preferred practice among supporters of gifted education. Roeper Review, 32, 235-248.

Zakrisson, I. (2005). Construction of a short version of the Right-Wing Authoritarianism (RWA) scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 863–872.

I would agree with Viren. Altmeyer, Hunsberger would be the way to go. Here is some background articles that would be useful. The RWA and the RWAS are really considered to be valuable in examining both RWA and Fundamentalism to something like r=.90.

Mavor, K. I., Macleod, C. J., Boal, M. J., & Louis, W. R. (2009). Right-wing authoritarianism, fundamentalism and prejudice revisited: Removing suppression and statistical artefact. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(5), 592-597.

Altemeyer, B., & Hunsberger, B. (1992). Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2(2), 113-133.

Laythe, B., Finkel, D. G., Bringle, R. G., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2002). Religious fundamentalism as a predictor of prejudice: A two‐component model. Journal for the Scientific study of Religion, 41(4), 623-635.

Krauss, S. W., Streib, H., Keller, B., & Silver, C. (2006). The distinction between authoritarianism and fundamentalism in three cultures: Factor analysis and personality correlates. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 28(1), 341-348.

Dear Kamil Viren and Austin, Thank you for the important question and for the illuminating replies. You have got me so interested that I must explore your leads. Best wishes Paul

Viren, Paul, Austin, thank you for your support and suggestions. That was a big help for me.

hi kamil ,

very interesting question, I reckon it's a formidable task to come up with an instrument

assessing and gauging totalitarianism since it is a slippery concept merging into some other traits like disciplinarianism , strictness, inflexibility, and managerial leadership techniques . Educational  self centerdness, narcissism, despotism and pedagogical egoism are intimately related to this issue.