What is the added advantage of labeling an empirically established geographic range as "home" in the first place? The range is bound to differ over the seasons and years, across the distribution area and between males and females. Introducing "use" could lead to distinction between feeding, breeding, resting, transit and other ranges. Anyhow, I have studiously avoided ill-defined epithets such as "home" and "habitat" for highly mobile, large mammals (bear, gorilla and elephant ). Here in Namibia, I would not know what the "home" range of leopard (or cheetah and lion) would mean; only for the burrowing Brown Hyena the apparent range could probably labelled with "home".
Article Where the bears roam in Majella National Park, Italy
There's two papers on density of Sunda clouded leopards distribution in reserves in this issue of Oryx, they might not be exactly what your after but may be of some use. One is in Filipe's files but also see Brodie & Geordano.