I have already completed a review article but I am confused about the authenticity of this article. This paper already get rejected from journals for plagiarism. If anyone can help or suggest anything, It will be very kind of you.
Publishers use this kind of software. For instance, Elsevier uses CrossCheck
https://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk/plagiarism-complaints/plagiarism-detection
from http://www.ithenticate.com/
There are some other solutions:
http://www.plagscan.com/
http://www.grammarly.com/
https://smallseo.tools/plagiarism-checker
https://fullversoftware.com/plagiarism-checker-x-5-1-4-pro-free-download/
http://sunysudan.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-to-check-plagiarism-for-free.html
Apparently a similarity index below 10% (or up to 24% for some journals or publishers) is acceptable.
Publishers use this kind of software. For instance, Elsevier uses CrossCheck
https://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk/plagiarism-complaints/plagiarism-detection
from http://www.ithenticate.com/
There are some other solutions:
http://www.plagscan.com/
http://www.grammarly.com/
https://smallseo.tools/plagiarism-checker
https://fullversoftware.com/plagiarism-checker-x-5-1-4-pro-free-download/
http://sunysudan.blogspot.com/2019/04/how-to-check-plagiarism-for-free.html
Apparently a similarity index below 10% (or up to 24% for some journals or publishers) is acceptable.
Dear Chris Gueymard thank you so much sir, I have already submitted one of my research article at a springer journal, they suggested me to rewrite the paper and try to keep the plagiarism percentage below 12%. Thank you again for your valuable suggestion, this will help me much.
The percentage is kind of meaningless and arbitrary and must be on a case by case basis of the text in question. If you have a lot of fixed terms that always feature in papers on the same topic, it will naturally have a higher percentage.
Consider the screenshot I have just uploaded. This highlighted text in red is responsible for 2% of this paper's 20% Ithenticate similarity score. Obviously this is discounted as "be divided into the following X steps" is just a common use of language.
Going through ever instance of similarity on a seemingly high score of 20%, you easily see that there is no concern of plagiarism.
The second instance, on the otherhand, is clearly plagiarism (of the authors previous work, which still counts as plagiarism!). Whilst this seems harsh, one must simply paraphrase or try entirely restate the form. If, as is the case in this example, the author wishes to use an identical table, simply cite the table in the other work.
A comparative analysis of anti-plagiarism software is available here (from Wikipedia):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_anti-plagiarism_software
Hope this helps,
Mike
Thank you so much Michael Taylor sir. This link will be a great help to me.
Best regards,
Rasel
Thanks a lot Chris Gueymard sir.it will be great help for me .
Best regards,
Arif
Thank you so much Jamie Matthew Bright sir for your valuable answer.
Yours sincerely,
Rasel Ahmed
Jamie Matthew Bright Matthew Bright, I think if you break up the overall percentage, and look at some individual phrases or sentences. indeed they could be argued as “commonly used.” When you have 20 of those “commonly used phrases/sentences” coming from the same reference, it’s plagerism to me. In general, I desk-reject anything beyond 20%.
Thank you Dazhi Yang sir. I got a different explanation from you Which I think will be helpful for me in the near future.
Yours sincerely,
Rasel Ahmed
- Badges
- Science topic