In our studies, we always talk about the green economy of protecting the earth against the effects of air and the influence of CO2 concentration in this. But the question that most of our auditors are asking is "Is the reduction of CO2 emissions, even if the study is not economically profitable, can be quantified and does it influence living beings and planet?
Very unclear question, but you want to know the influence of CO2 on the living.
As far as the humans and animals, this gas contributes to a change in climate, extreme weather that is getting more extreme by the minute and affects our well being.
This gas also dissolves in the sea and makes the water acidic. The more gas in the sea the harder it is for sea creatures to form a skeleton. Do you like humans without skeletons? Well in the sea this can be a big problem. Basically, sea life can be wiped out and this is already happening.
Please can you give more details about the question,
I think you should talk on the main ecosystem in the world, ocean, mangrove, caostal seas, forest,...
Are you aware that all life depends on CO2? The planet is impoverished for CO2. Some greenhouses artificially increase the CO2 level (to about 3 times the current atmospheric level) to enhance plant growth. The only observable effect of the added CO2 in earth’s atmosphere is that plant growth (food) has increased about 15%. This graph shows some history and conditions:
Exactly what I am looking for is a method or a way to answer those who put a balance between economic profitability and CO2 emission. in other words, if the project that contributes to the reduction of CO2 is not economically profitable, why should it be adopted?