Dear Scholar
Yes
This method does NOT follow any known principles of Mathematics including , Euclid's ELEMENTS. Hence the method adopted here is ORIGINAL and the result is EXTRAORDINARY. The world of Mathematics now see the REAL / TRUE/ EXACT / Algebraic Pi Value
Dear Sarva,
Sorry but your method does not find the correct value of pi:
your=3.146446609406726237799577818947575480357582031155762981705830066
pi=3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592
Try to find your error!
PS If you could argue that your method gives a value identical to true one at any desired accuracy, then bingo!
Dear Scholar
Present so called Pi number equal to 3.1415926.....is NOT that of circle. It is polygon based derived number.
Dear Sarva,
Pi is derived from elementary Calculus processes.
It is also a trivial demo in Monte Carlo simulation.
You have invented another interesting approximation of pi.
I am aware of at least one more.
But it is not pi!
3.1415926.... is NOT Pi
It is a polygon number
Father & son are related but NOT same
Similarly, inscribed polygon and circle may be associated but it is WRONG to ATTRIBUTE polygon number 3.1415926 ..to circle
Dear Sarva,
Have a look here:
https://www.r-bloggers.com/estimation-of-the-number-pi-a-monte-carlo-simulation/
If you run code for 1000000 you get:
[1] 3.141532
Or look here:
https://helloacm.com/r-programming-tutorial-how-to-compute-pi-using-monte-carlo-in-r/
Or here:
https://www.r-bloggers.com/estimation-of-the-number-pi-a-monte-carlo-simulation/
You always tend to 3.1415926535...
Dear Scholar
I am sorry I do not agree thrusting polygon number 3.1415926....on circle as its pi value.
Dear Scholar
Latest Finding is pi lies between 3.13.........to 3.147.....
New value of pi is 3.146.....
Dear Sarva,
In Monte Carlo computation of pi we do not use any kind of polygons, we just drop arrows and count the successive trials...
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics