Since 2012 Rio plus 20 when green market paradigm shift avoidance started by going dwarf green market instead of green markets we have seen the growth of exism movements against majority rule based liberal democracy governments all over the world, both populism with a mask based movements such as Brexism, Trumpism, Brazilianism, Argentinexism and so on; AND non-democratically based movements such as green Marxism calls, yellow Marxism calls or eco-socialism calls, or red Marxism calls for paradigm double down, all have in common the theme of anti-status quo government threats using ongoing government intervention in majority rule based liberal democracies needed to implement dwarf green markets and to avoid perfect market shifts as a sword against itself….

By making authoritarianism a normal activity in those countries when implementing social and/or environmental policy outside of perfect free green market thinking they are making the entrance of exism movements easier or more likely as exism movements, left or right, see also authoritarianism as a normal activity too.

And this raises the question: Is perfect market paradigm shift avoidance since 2012 helping to normalize government authoritarianism in majority rule based liberal countries making them weaker in the face of left or right exism movements?

What do you think?

Yes, why?

No, why not?

More Lucio Muñoz's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions