In fact, the asymmetry between the mirror particles is not only parity non-conservation, but also a new asymmetry -- the magnetic moment of the positive antiproton is not symmetrical, the difference is up to 6.56*10^-9. The main reason is that the mass difference of the internal components of the positive antiproton, namely Σ± particle mass difference, leads to the slight difference in magnetic moment between the two! Is the cause of difficulty parity nonconservation the same as the asymmetry of the positive antiproton magnetic moment?
No, parity isn’t conserved by the weak interactions, while it is conserved by the electromagnetic and strong interactions.
If there's a difference inside the mirror particle, it's going to decay differently, right? Just like the positive and antiproton magnetic moments are affected by different components within them
The magnetic moment is a property of the electromagnetic interactions, not the weak interactions. Electromagnetic interactions preserve parity, so it’s wrong to claim that parity violation could be involved when discusing electromagnetic properties of hadrons.
Therefore any difference in decay rates can’t be detected if only electromagnetic effects are involved.
Although electromagnetic field is indeed needed to measure magnetic moment, it does not mean that magnetic moment is only related to electromagnetic interaction, and mass is also one of the influencing factors. According to my analysis of experimental data of magnetic moment, all magnetic moment anomalies in baryon octa-state are caused by mass changes caused by strong interaction and weak interaction. It has nothing to do with electromagnetic interaction. If you don't agree with me, I don't think it's necessary for us to argue endlessly about this. I have made 5 data predictions in my table, which I have published here, just waiting for experimental testing, and experiments are capable of testing, which is much more reliable than human assumptions
In addition, the interior of hadrons is still a blind spot, and the information detected so far is fragmentary, so there is still a lot of work to be done. I don't think the existence of the interior of hadrons can be determined by a few apparent detections so far. Then, you mentioned decay, and in terms of my review of all the experimental data on particles and nuclei, and the comparison with existing theories, the decay calculation is in many cases simplified, because it ignores the fact that decay also has an effect on structures, especially complex particles like hadrons, and I hope that our communication will be technical, not theoretical, so that we can learn somethin！