Go back to Euler, Lagrange and the eighteenth century thinkers. They laid a foundation for much of the scientific knowledge today. Much of that knowledge tends to commerce. Yet, in a way, commerce resists abstraction of thought. So, is the mechanics of knowledge (knowing) an harmonic conserved structure? If so, what does the conservation tell us about nature?
Peter Thomas Byrne Gregory
I'd be more prone to lay responsibility at the feet of Aristotle. You say harmonic, but why not elegant? Conservation? These words live in a space between modern thinking (corporate economics) and something humane (and no I don't think they are the same). You use the term 'scientific reality' as if someone got it right. Which part harmonises with which part?
0 votes
0 thanks
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematics
More Fred Amonya's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions