In no way can we interpret history from a single point of view, because history can only be understood by placing all the facts of the event under the morgue of analysis.

Prof Dr Ahmed Shaker Alalaq

Have I got a reasonable translation to your question?

'As it is known that history in general cannot be brought up for discussion once we understand a small part of it, as it is necessary to understand the aspects of making that event in order to reach an integrated scientific result in the morgue of history and analysis, and from this standpoint the historian must subject himself to a self-analysis first, knowing his intellectual direction and knowledge.'

I am not an expert on history, but in agreement with your second response, I feel that - as with any subject - it is necessary to have as wider a knowledge as possible and from as many view points as possible.