Is it possible that the changes in the climate are more linked to an end of geologycal era than to the human act? I mean, the change in the pattern of the flight from some type of birds, that localize themselves by magnectic field is an evidence that the magnetic poles are inverting themselves, and this could be the responsible for this behaviour change in these birds. An inversion in the magnectic poles is imposible to be induced by humans, and it is a common change that occurs from time to time in each era, don’t? The melting of glaciers are common either in the end of eras, don’t?
While natural geological processes, such as magnetic pole reversals, have occurred throughout Earth's history, the overwhelming scientific consensus attributes the current climate change primarily to human activities, particularly the increase in greenhouse gas emissions. The changes in bird behavior you mentioned may have multiple factors, and while magnetic pole reversals are part of Earth's natural processes, there is no evidence to suggest that they are the primary driver of contemporary climate change. The melting of glaciers is indeed a complex phenomenon influenced by various factors, including human-induced climate change. It's important to recognize the distinction between natural geological processes and the anthropogenic impacts contributing to the current environmental changes.
Thank you for your answer professor @Miloud Chakit I would like to know the opinion on this hypothesis from any geologist especialist. Because if there is a link between the occurrence of magnetic pole reversal, melting of glaciers and increasing in the world temperatures with the end of a natural geological era, would be important to know, don’t you think?
Mathematical models of increasing planetary temperature as a function of the argument - anthropogenic influence - are erroneous.
Thank you for you answer Borys Kapochkin . Why they are erroneous? Their prediction power is low, Is because of it? Could you dissertate more about it, please?
Interesting question, Dr Pedro Paulo Gattai
But I agree with Miloud Chakit who mentions a lot of factors that could be involved. However, I feel that now there is so much evidence of human-induced climate change that this is very much likely to be the main cause. I just hope that there are global changes to reverse the processes before it is too late. Not only would no reversal affect human kind but also affect every other living thing - animals and plants - all of which have played no part in human-induced climate change.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Cartography
- Mapping
- Maps