I find organizations locating their DEI efforts and initiative, programming as well as coordinator or manager positions under the Human Resources Management Unit head/Department.
is this a good location/good fit for the success of the position of the person and offering support to the person in getting their work done.
Dear Saleha Khan
In my opinion,Hosting a DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) Office under the Human Resources Department can be beneficial because HR is centrally involved in hiring, training, and policy implementation, which are critical for fostering DEI initiatives; however, this structure may also risk marginalizing DEI efforts by treating them as an HR function rather than a organization-wide priority, potentially limiting their impact and visibility. For DEI to thrive, it needs cross-departmental authority and leadership support, so while HR can provide a practical home, the DEI Office should have sufficient autonomy and resources to influence broader organizational culture and decision-making.
Great question! Placing Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) efforts within the Human Resources (HR) department is a common practice, and whether it’s a good fit depends on various factors. Here are some considerations to help evaluate if this organisational placement supports the success of DEI initiatives:
Pros of Locating DEI within HR:
1. Alignment with Talent Management: HR is responsible for recruiting, onboarding, training, and employee relations, which align closely with DEI goals. Integrating DEI can help embed inclusive practices throughout the employee lifecycle.
2. Policy Development and Compliance: HR often manages organisational policies and compliance issues. Having DEI within HR can ensure policies promote equity and adhere to legal standards.
3. Centralised Oversight: HR’s existing structure can facilitate coordination of diversity initiatives alongside other HR functions, potentially streamlining efforts.
Challenges and Considerations:
1. Potential for Limited Focus: DEI initiatives sometimes require dedicated strategic focus that may not be fully supported if embedded solely within HR, which has broader responsibilities.
2. Risk of Marginalisation: When DEI is housed solely within HR, it can sometimes be viewed as just another HR task rather than a strategic priority, risking marginalisation or lack of influence.
3. Need for Cross-Functional Engagement: DEI efforts often benefit from a broader organisational perspective, involving leadership, operations, and other departments. Placing DEI outside HR or establishing it as a standalone office can enhance visibility and influence.
Is HR a good place for a DEI office?
- Yes, it can be effective if the DEI function is given sufficient authority, resources, and strategic positioning within HR. It can leverage HR's influence on policies, training, and culture change.
- However, many organisations opt for a separate, standalone DEI office or Chief Diversity Officer position to elevate its importance, facilitate cross-departmental collaboration, and avoid being subsumed under HR’s broader agenda.
Conclusion:
- Placing DEI initiatives within HR can be suitable if the organisation ensures that DEI has adequate strategic independence, visibility, and support from top leadership.
- For enhanced effectiveness, organisations often establish a dedicated DEI office or officer with a direct reporting line to the CEO or executive leadership, ensuring DEI receives the focus and resources necessary for meaningful impact.
Ultimately, the best organisational placement depends on the organisation’s size, culture, leadership commitment, and strategic priorities.
DEI is a bed rock of inclusive and progressive culture in an organisation. Human Resource function drives and enables the culture charter of an organisation. To ensure there is information, sensitisation, policies, practices of diversity and inclusion as part of culture building is the role of Human Resource function . Hence the role must be within Human Resource function . However the functional leader must ensure that it is not a tick box , compliance , externally glorified role but a meaningful one which truly makes a statement of best practice by the organisation to the larger world in hiring talent , developing talent and nurturing talent through diversity and inclusion
Debashish Das
Bed rock??
DEI is a corrupt practice that has had its day and now is being dumped
MIT - https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mit-closes-dei-office-amid-trump-dispute-harvard/
Stanford - https://stanforddaily.com/2025/02/13/dei-removal-from-web-pages/
Harvard - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair_Admissions_v._Harvard
Businesses -
https://finance.alot.com/business/10-us-companies-committed-to-dei-and-10-who-dropped-their-dei-policies--22210
https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/04/11/ibm-reportedly-walks-back-diversity-policies-citing-inherent-tensions-here-are-all-the-companies-rolling-back-dei-programs/
Everyone - DEI falls - https://www.deseret.com/magazine/2025/06/17/the-rise-and-fall-of-dei/
Saleha Khan Locating a DEI office under Human Resources can be practical, as HR oversees hiring, policy, and workplace culture—key areas for DEI impact. However, for true influence and independence, DEI should ideally have direct access to executive leadership or be positioned as a cross-functional unit. When embedded solely within HR, there’s a risk DEI becomes compliance-focused rather than transformational. Support, visibility, and integration across departments are critical for success—regardless of where the office is housed.
- Badges
- Science topic