As you know, nitrogen and oxygen are useful for us humans, but they are gases that are effective in changing the climate of the planet, and one of the gases is the only percentage of carbon dioxide that destroys the ozone layer. CO2 emission as a result of human activities is one of the basic factors controlling the physical and chemical processes of the atmosphere. The human population has increased the greenhouse effect of the atmosphere and changed the thermal budget by releasing pollutants. The increase in pCO2 of the atmosphere compared to the pre-industrial period leads to a greater absorption of atmospheric CO2 and a decrease in the release of oceanic carbon dioxide. Therefore, more of the absorbed carbon dioxide remains in the oceans and affects the composition of ocean water. The heterogeneous distribution of landmasses and as a result the unequal distribution of population in the two hemispheres of the earth has caused the difference in the emission of pollutants and atmospheric compounds in the two hemispheres of the earth. The temporal-spatial distribution of pollutants shows that there is an increasing trend of CO2 and it has been uniform during the recent periods, and despite the difference in amounts, it has had a similar trend in the two regions of the earth. It can be seen that the future contracts in northern temperate latitudes have increased compared to other latitudes of the globe.
Of course, carbonated soft drinks use CO2 gas, which is very useful for digestion, but on the other hand, it is harmful for osteoporosis and causes arthritis. Coca-Cola is also used as a powerful tire cleaner. And also some things are used for cleaning.
In general, greenhouse gases can be classified into two large groups. The first group of gases specified in the Kyoto Protocol includes methane, (CH4) and nitrogen oxide (N2O), hydrofluoric carbon (HFCS) and hexafluorosulfur (SF6). The second group is the gases specified in the Montreal Protocol and includes carbon chlorofluorocarbons (CFCS), hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCS), and halons.
The effect of each gas in increasing the greenhouse effect depends on the concentration of the gas, the wavelengths absorbed, the amount of absorption per molecule and the presence or absence of gases that absorb the same wavelength.
"one of the gases is the only percentage of carbon dioxide that destroys the ozone layer"
"Coca-Cola is also used as a powerful tire cleaner."
Sounds legit.
Dear Sal Mangiafico
PhD (Associate) at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
United States
Greetings and respect
Thank you very much for answering my question.
Do you think this article is correct or did I convey it wrongly? Because the CO2 in Coca-Cola is edible. But according to Bishner, climatologists consider methane gas to be more destructive than CO2 gas, which, for example, in Brazil, where they have destroyed the Amazon forests and started cattle ranches instead, they have destroyed both the vegetation and the forest soil. and the cows themselves, as they have 4 stomachs, produce methane gas in the air, which destroys the ozone layer.
Thanks Abbas
- Nobody washes car tires with Coca-cola. Because it has carbonic acid and phosphoric acid, it has a low-pH and could clean in certain situations. But it also has sugar and isn't the cheapest thing. ... This is the problem when AI programs that write these things scrape all the silly articles on the internet. It returns silly things.
- I'm not even sure what the sentence I quoted is trying to say. Carbon dioxide depletes the ozone layer ?
Does hunting sharks, octopuses and whales affect the ozone layer?
As you know, the hunting of sea animals in the ocean has increased a lot and humans have obtained new foods and unknowingly caused the destruction of the natural environment of the oceans and because 2/3 of the earth is covered by water and the oceans act as purifiers They are considered dry. And if we destroy the marine environment, we can no longer use the oceans as a lever to prevent climate change. This is very worrying. If you remember, when the Americans migrated from Europe to the American continent, after some time they started hunting the animals of this continent, and then they realized that they should not do this because it causes climate change, for example, along the Mississippi River, they started They hunted water otter. Later, they realized that the river had become rotten and became a swamp, and the researchers investigated and found that it was due to water otter hunting. Because water otter builds a dam in the river, and fishes spawn. Now that the water otter has been hunted, the number of fish has decreased, and due to the lack of fish, water purification has also disappeared. The river had turned into a swamp. Now that we have come to this knowledge, why will we destroy the ozone layer in the future by destroying the marine environment? And do we destroy and damage our natural environment and live in it and suffer from global warming?
Dear Sal Mangiafico
PhD (Associate) at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
United States
Greetings and respect
Thank you very much for answering my question.
Abbas Kashani , I honestly don't understand your point, or what response you expect. Perhaps someone else can compose a better response. Good luck with your work. ~ SSM
Dear Sal Mangiafico
I think I sent you the wrong answer. I am very sorry that I didn't understand you well and I just wanted to get to know your professors and see who are in this scientific journal that I can talk to. I am also married. And I have taught for 32 years and now maybe I wanted to share my opinions with others. In short, sorry if my information was limited. Thank you Abbas
Abbas Kashani , no worries. I just really don't understand what point you are trying to make. ... I don't think you can say that carbon dioxide itself is good or bad. It plays many different roles on the planet and in organisms.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Geoscience
- Atmospheric Sciences
- Atmosphere