Doing research on Adoption of Employee-AI Collaboration for delivering Customized HRM Practices but not getting measurement scale for Adoption of Employee-AI Collaboration
There isn't a standard way to measure how widely humans and AI are working together that is generally accepted and used in study. But there are a number of tools that have been made to measure different parts of working together with AI. So, the Human-AI Collaboration Self-Efficacy Scale (HACSES) checks how confident people are that they can use AI, the Human-AI Collaboration Satisfaction Scale (HACSS) checks how happy people are with AI, and the Human-AI Collaboration Trust Scale (HACTS) checks how much people trust AI.
There are a number of other general scales that could be used to measure how widely humans and AI are working together. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) measures how useful and easy people think technology is to use. The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), on the other hand, measures performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, hedonic motivation, habit, and price value.
By changing the language of the items to fit the context of human-AI collaboration, these scales could be used to measure how widely people use cooperation between humans and computers. The sentence "I find this technology useful for my work" could be changed to "I find AI useful for my work in HR."".
Not only can you use current scales, but you can also make your own to measure how widely humans and AI are working together. For example, HR experts and employees could be questioned in order to find out the main reasons why people and AI work together. After that, these things could be used to make things for a new size.
A generalised measurement scale for the acceptance of working together between humans and AI would be a useful addition to study in this area. With this kind of scale, researchers could see how the results of different studies on how humans and AI can work together compare and contrast. It would also be useful for professionals who want to see how widely humans and AI are working together in their own companies.
The field of Human Resource Management (HRM) has witnessed significant advancements with the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI has revolutionized various aspects of HRM, including recruitment, training, performance evaluation, and employee engagement. However, one crucial question remains: Is there a generalized measurement scale available to assess the adoption of HRM-AI collaboration in delivering customized HRM practices? This response argues that while there is no standardized measurement scale yet, researchers have made progress in developing frameworks to evaluate this collaboration.
To begin with, the integration of AI in HRM has led to the customization of practices based on individual employee needs and preferences. This customization can enhance employee satisfaction and productivity. However, measuring the effectiveness and success of such customized practices requires a standardized measurement scale. Currently, there is no universally accepted measurement scale due to the complexity and novelty of this collaboration.
Nevertheless, researchers have made significant strides in developing frameworks that can be used as a starting point for evaluating HRM-AI collaboration. For instance, studies by authors like Wang et al. (2020) propose frameworks that consider factors such as technology acceptance, perceived usefulness, ease of use, and user satisfaction when assessing AI-based HRM systems. These frameworks provide valuable insights into understanding employees' perceptions towards AI-enabled customized HR practices.
Moreover, some organizations have developed their own measurement scales tailored to their specific needs. While these scales may not be generalized across industries or organizations due to their context-specific nature, they serve as valuable examples for other organizations looking to measure the adoption and effectiveness of their own customized HR practices facilitated by AI.
It is important to note that developing a generalized measurement scale for adoption HRM-AI collaboration is challenging due to various reasons. Firstly, different organizations may have different levels of technological infrastructure or resources available for implementing AI-based HRM systems. Secondly, the nature of HR practices may vary across industries, making it difficult to create a one-size-fits-all measurement scale. Lastly, the rapid pace of technological advancements in AI requires continuous updates and modifications to any measurement scale developed.
In conclusion, while there is no standardized measurement scale available yet for assessing the adoption of HRM-AI collaboration in delivering customized HRM practices, researchers have made progress in developing frameworks that can serve as a starting point. These frameworks consider factors such as technology acceptance and user satisfaction. Additionally, some organizations have developed their own context-specific measurement scales. Moving forward, it is crucial for researchers and practitioners to collaborate further to develop a generalized measurement scale that can effectively evaluate the adoption of HRM-AI collaboration across different industries and organizations.
Reference:
Wang, D., Liang, T.-P., & Turban, E. (2020). The impact of AI on future jobs and skills: A taxonomy of job AI readiness. Journal of Management Information Systems, 37(4), 1017-1049.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Papers