I realize that you do not know me. I entered the research world to find solutions that are not available in the practitioner layperson world. i found them.
in the spirit of universal psychology, without borders, i foresee the need for a global accreditation body for continuing education credits, with scientific representation from many countries and interactive sciences, to facilitate quicker recognition of cutting edge solutions, from all over the world, from every culture. This accreditation body would not be subject to the limitations of old ivy league men's club bias, nor subject to pressures from special interests.
An initial board of scientists from many countries, with a diversity of scientific specialty would oversee acceptance of protocol for accreditation. So that continuing education credits would count towards licensure fulfillment. Eventually such a global accreditation board would be the highest level of accreditation, above the level of state, and even country accreditation bodies. Granted the initial global accreditation body might not have any real power, but it would serve as a place order for the future.
If you can dream it, you can build it. I am asking for the help, assistance and guidance of "can do" scientists who wish to bring the future to the patient now. not waiting for new solutions to filter through a broken, bottlenecked system, perhaps one that is even intentionally slow to change, so that those who profit from the status quo can continue to do so.
Not on my watch. Elizabeth Gilley
In light of the latest developments in AI, I am visualizing a massive shift in higher education, maybe the emergence an altogether new model. The academia, especially the quality specialists, have to foresee the changes and come up new metrics (qualitative and quantitative) to measure the performance and standards. Having said that I full concur with your statement that there is a need of global accreditation body. Count me in.
It is a good initiative of having a universal accreditation body. I wish you will scale through with country's bottle necks. I am interested when you want my personal academic contributions.
Your Elizabeth Dale Gilley proposition can indeed lay the groundwork for a universal standardization in protocol for accreditation across different scientific specialties. This global accreditation board can have a significant role in maintaining high standards of scientific inquiry and education across various countries. While the initial power of such a board may be limited, its influence and scope could expand over time, facilitating scientific collaboration and unity. Ultimately, its success would largely depend upon acceptance and cooperative engagement from individual countries and their respective scientific institutions.
I appreciate you took the initiative. Certainly a protocol of standardised for accreditation, and global board of frame work is a great idea, though as usual it also potentially risky for to be manipulation and likely be taken for granted by some people if proper assessment procedure not applied well, in.
I am willing to contribute in support of the system for betterment.
Regards
Fatema Miah
thank you all for contributing your thoughts and ideas about an international accreditation board for psychological applications from the genomic era of addiction of medicine - Elle Foundation International Accreditation Board
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Graphs