To examine the basis of corruption is very simple. It is the love of money, but to determine the existence of corruption, it opens up many factors like: Culture, the level of Economic welfare , the power and control of the law, morals and the level of education all of these and other factors may limit and effect a large proportion of corruption.

This query begs a definition of corruption, which is shorthand reference for a broad range of illicit or illegal activities. Anyhow, especially in developing countries, the study of corruption is undergoing a radical revision: scholars now emphasize the need to move away from the study of corruption as individual acts of deviant behavior; instead, we should acknowledge that corruption can become institutionalized as informal rules and routines, which put pressure on individuals to perform accordingly, often against their will. Therefore, conceptual frameworks should reflect the fact that institutionalized corruption takes many forms, and so reorient research from measuring the extent of corruption to highlighting qualitative differences in the organization of corruption.

To examine the basis of corruption is very simple. It is the love of money, but to determine the existence of corruption, it opens up many factors like: Culture, the level of Economic welfare , the power and control of the law, morals and the level of education all of these and other factors may limit and effect a large proportion of corruption.

Economic factors are not the only the determinant of corruption, rather power, position, incumbency factors are the other determinant of corruption.

Following.

corruption is based on asymmetric power. When some can dictate and ask for benefits even when it would be required that they just do their work as required.

thanks a lot for your response

corruption is also based on people's inability to deal with those who exploit their influence for their own benefits.

Corruption can be called those actions or omissions carried out by public officials and civil servants in coordination with sectors of non-governmental civil society, which facilitate:

1. Loss of public resources

2. Inadequate decision making

To achieve these two objectives, they build processes and procedures in each of the Public Management areas that give a basis of legality to these actions.

Therefore, we could consider that a cause of corruption is the isolation between the members of the Non-Governmental Civil Society and the population that exercises the governmental work, the ignorance of how the Public Administration works and the permissibility of who comes to those positions , the lack of transparency in the administration of resources and the issuance of ambiguous laws

In addition to the excellent answers already given, I would add weak respect and adherence to the rule of law both among public officials and members of society in general. Adherence to rational, rule-based decisionmaking reduces the risk of corruption. This conclusion is based on a comparative study of elderly services in Norway and the Baltic countries.

ANY TIME , ANY WHERE THERE IS A BAD AND UNPATRIOTIC LEADER. DEVELOPMENT STAGNATES. THE PEOPLE BECOME CORRUPT.

There are many types of corruption, but the most dangerous one is the administrative corruption

Thanks for all your answers

Researches has shown that various factors cause corruption to be divided into three general groups: environmental, intra-organizational and individual factors.

In the environmental aspect, deficiencies and weaknesses of laws and regulations; in the organizational dimension, managerial factors and in the individual dimension, ethical issues have the greatest impact on the occurrence of corruption.

Is it correct?

But i think:

Economic issues are at the forefront of all of these causes

https://www.transparency.org/

You can read a lot about corruption here.

There a lots of good ways to reduce risks of corruption but you will not eliminate risks.

I think it can be helpful to look at this from a pluralist perspective. If a society is made up of many different groups, each with their own interests, if one group is able to gain power to the point where it can infringe upon the rights of the other groups, the political system would likely become corrupt or would at least run a higher risk of devolving into corruption

Corruption would have been some solutions to acute difficulties to those who cannot put food on their table for their family but at the same time, gives their best to serve their nation-state. But today, corruption has become, 'the have gets more and, the have not gets less'. In my opinion, corruption is pure greediness, apartheid in its nature, and social racism from opportunistic individuals.

opportunity is the one word answer.

to eliminate corruption there has to be structures of checks and balances that make it more difficult.

There are diverse factors of corruption viz. Economic, Social, Political etc. It depends on individual's interests.

One of the causes of corruption is greed. The uncontrolled desire to acquire more (primitive accumulation).

I would say greed is the topmost cause of corruption