entering antinatalism or natalism into a search engine and one will find an extensive list of antinatalist position. there is obvious antinatalist bias in academia. antinatalist policies are proving to be very damaging to society. more studies are needed to clarify the difference between antinatalism, and natalism.
One-child policy, official program initiated in the late 1970s and early ’80s by the central government of China, the purpose of which was to limit the great majority of family units in the country to one child each. The rationale for implementing the policy was to reduce the growth rate of China’s enormous population. It was announced in late 2015 that the program was to end in early 2016.Kenneth Pletcher Former Encyclopædia Britannica Editor
How the natalist views are suppressed in general(relating to the general population), or in the context of academia?
the general population often follows trends originating in academia. starting our investigation with academia therefor would be a logical starting point. gender studies history is a good place to start due to the available documentation.
This would be true on some accounts, but for the majority there is a protruding inconclusiveness that is misrepresented in the form of anecdotal data, to which people seem to rely more heavily on.
But to answer the ACTUAL question, Political propaganda, Persuasive media (more dependent on technological advancement in the last 2 decades), and Healthcare structuralism, are some of the more ever pressing factors to which natalist views are suppressed.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Sociology