What lies outside of the boundaries of space. I find the problem in this question is our knowledge, we have a prior belief that we are exist inside space, this belief that doesn’t based on any evidence, so I think before we asking, what lies outside of space? We must first ask, are the objects lying inside space or outside of it?
I think if objects are exist outside of space, it will suffer from superposition or uncertainty in position depending on the distance from space or how far is it from space.
I am not certain that you mean "space" in the usual sense of "space and time continuum".
No, it isn't-it doesn't make sense. Any observer probes spacetime, that reacts to the probe. This is described by Einstein's equations.
The metric of any observer isn't ``the same'' as that of any other, in general; they're related by general coordinate transformations, the symmetries of Einstein's equations.
what is space? like; what is time?,, there is no a accurate answer, we need deep understanding of space-time continuum.. before Einstein, physicists claimed that they are understand space and time completely, till Einstein publishes his paper 1905 .. Now I think there is something missing in our understanding about space-time continuum
I find that uncertainty in position of an object means how far is the object from space. By this new definition of uncertainty in position I tried to introduce a new definition or accurate understanding for uncertainty in velocity. Regarding to uncertainty principle, the less uncertainty in position the more uncertainty in velocity, we can replace uncertainty in position with the new definition that is mentioned before, so we can say that “the closer bodies to space have the more uncertainty in velocity.” I suggest that uncertainty in velocity means acceleration of the body per time as a result of the proximity to space. This study supposes that all objects are revolved around space axis while it moving along space, we can unify both the rotation motion and the longitudinal “linear” motion of the object as twisting motion. In other words, all objects are twisted around space where the closer objects from space suffer from more acceleration than the distant objects. The purpose of my paper was to show that the observer effect in the double slit experiment can be explained in sense.
Are you think that dimensions are always exist, so what about Entanglement?
the observer effect in the double slit experiment can simply be explained, for an electron to become detectable, a photon must first interact with it, and this interaction gives the electron an additional kinetic energy that accelerates the electron with and makes it jumping from its distant “higher” orbit to a nearby “lower” orbit that it exists at a small distance from space
Even free electrons have levels, the center of these levels is space itself, perhaps this is strange but this can be the simplest reason for Uncertainty principle
Imagine that you aren't in space rather you exist away from space by 0.000003 meter, now along this small distance, space is meaningless so I can't determine your position accurately, therefore there is uncertainty in position and this uncertainty equals the distance between you and space..
Matter exist outside of spacetime continuum with so small values,
there is an experiment to prove that, and i hope to do it soon
Traduci testo o pagina web questa è una domanda molto interessante anche in una realtà dello spirito. Una realtà che credo esista anche se è fuori dal mondo della scienza fisica. Non so dare una risposta ma desidero essere informato se fai dei progressi in questo campo this is a very interesting question even in a reality of the spirit. A reality that I believe exists even if it is outside the world of physical science. I can not give an answer but I want to be informed if you make progress in this field
"the distance from space or how far is it from space"
It is senseless. If you define "the distance from space" you have to introduce some bulk space, which contains the space itself.
So your question has too vague formulation.
As there is no any spontaneous process, we could say that each process involves entities of the present but mostly of the past. If we consider space (and not spacetime) as the "membrane" of spacetime, of 1 Planck time thickness, we may talk about entities outside of space (or of space of the past/previous time). There is no way to treat space separately of time, otherwise we should ask: What we mean by "space".
From this point of view we could conceive a "distance of an entity from space" as the distance between its point of the past and its point of the present(space) within spacetime.
PS: @ Edgar Korteweg , Entities that are related are by no means the same.
We are made of atoms that bear a "spiritual" reality, the one that allows us to made and express these reflections. What the atoms support is our essence: a "spiritual" essence. Atoms can not spontaneously aggregate to create a man, not even to create the simplest living organism. The question is: can this "spiritual" reality exist without the atoms? If this were the case, we could exist outside of space and time.
Yes. The Space and Time is necessary for existence of fermions: atoms and its constituents, therefore for human body. Question is only: Is the spirit without a body a man?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Theoretical Physics