Tentative questions:
If you have received supervision as a practitioner working in different professions, for example, coaching and psychotherapy, was there any difference in the supervisor-supervisee relationship?
If you were a practitioner who has seen the same supervisor for work in more than one domain, was the relationship and/or alliance any more important depending upon whether or not you were discussing a therapeutic client or coachee?
I have received supervision working as a psychotherapist, as a counselor, and as a career counselor. My supervisor-supervisee relationships as a psychotherapist and a counselor were very similar. There was an emphasis on processing either videotaped session content or live observation, and the supervisor gave specific feedback regarding my counselor responses. The focus was on my functioning as an individual. My supervisor-supervisee relationship as a career counselor involved much less direct observation or videotaping. In the career counseling supervisory relationship, there was more of a focus on my functioning as a team member who was part of the career center staff. There was some review of audio taped sessions, but because much of my work was not confidential (e.g., consultation or facilitating group workshops), my supervisor could directly observe my work without the use of a one-way mirror or video recording.
If you look at Kieran O'Donoghue's writing which is cited here on Researchgate you will find some interesting material.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Ethics