A combined topology of two converters with common elements is to be designed, where switching between the two converters can be done only when required (no importance of frequency of switching here). After switching ON/OFF each of the converters will be controlled differently and they will be completely independent.
So if contactors are used, conduction losses would be higher. Even if semiconductor switches are used then we need a bidirectional and bipolar arrangement of switches, the number of switches will increase and the conduction loss in them will also be present.
So I want to know what can be the other methods for this one-time switching because I want the path to be like the simple conductor with minimum or no additional losses. Or what kind of switching would be best here?
Original title of my article « Synchro » was concerning the compativility of two independent paracompactness definitions. Topological fixed formality is probably in general not established. Categorical duality between the real category and the vomplex category is at last established there, however, it is a very topologically formal result. It is esdentially different both to ring theoretical duality (it is the classical problematic begore l’anneau singulier) and to functional duality setting such that F-LF, F-DF, etc. I proposed recently to Etienne Ghys that Physico-mathematiques i achvees should be the volume three of my Vollected Works. That is, ots beginni g detting of variable transfotmation is treated there zs a ki d of topological fuality. It can be z tivzted after the Synchro and other my articles of throry of measures.
Isn’t there resonance amongst fresuencies of « common elements » and of « converters setting » ?