I shall consider this as a 'sharing'. It seems to me we require a categorization of topics within philosophy that speak to the accepted titles but in more colloquial terms, as also an administrator tasked with assuring its success. It seems we need some few rules that another administrator should monitor. It seems also that we need to distinguish qualified writers from novices, without denying the latter to ask questions and increase learning potential, and we need an administrator (or the administrators collectively) to assess such status without invidious distinctions (academic-independent, e.g.). Finally, I personally believe we need a 'style' monitor to police against glibness, silliness, stupidity, cupidity, errant remarks, and etc. However much I ever saw reason to disagree with David Hirst, his recent observations as to retaining the conviction of disappearance appear to me entirely warranted, whereat while I do not wish to disappear, I would like to think I can add without feeling it a waste of time and energy. Surely I am not alone here?