interesting ideas, keep going, someday, something good may emerge out of it. though I may not agree by the concepts presented, still good effort, best wishes.

Dear @Shankar Lal,

Thank you for your contribution! I just started a path. Created millions of opportunities for research scientists across globe.

Dear Satish Gajawada ,

while your ideas for algorithm's are really creative, I find it hard to evaluate them. What does it mean if you write "they perform well"? Are they fast, are they precise? Do you have a better quantification, better than just implementing a color coding?

Cheers,

Dominik

Dear @Dominik Fischer,

Thanks for your contribution! When they gave optimal solution, I said, performed well.

I have to admit fact that this is just the beginning of "Artificial Human Optimization", "Artificial Soul Optimization" and "Artificial God Optimization" fields.

In the past, when I submitted "PostDoc: The Human Optimization" to some conferences, they have strongly rejected. But I also got very very positive results from IEEE TAAI conference.

I kept hope and moved ahead. Today people are calling me "Founder and Father of Artificial Human Optimization field".

I accept that there is lot to improve. With the knowledge I have, I tried best.

Thanks for your appreciation!

Satish Gajawada

IIT Roorkee Alumnus.

Satish Gajawada

Well, I don't see the any relations with god/human/soul, just see some color codes. Is that a colorful title to attract people?

How can you say it performs well if you don't provide evidences?

If you can't provide any reasonable theoretical/experimental proofs to support your ideas, then it is just a bunch of bullshit.

If you are waiting evidences/proofs in the future, you can publish it later. No one will publish bullshit algorithm papers before you, so don't worry.

@Max Ma

Thanks for your contribution! My target is not to attract people but to come up with innovative ideas.

It gave optimal solution for all benchmark functions and hence green in colour.

Almost all researchers are working on Artificial insects, birds, bees, bat, plant, physics etc. I identified 3 solid research gaps and invented 3 new fields titled "Artificial Human Optimization", "Artificial Soul Optimization" and "Artificial God Optimization".

Please re-read the 3 Inventions and I am sure you will find relations to human, soul and God.

I just started new paths, complex and complicated algorithms will follow.

Please don't use negative language. Because the Inventions are about Humans, Souls and Gods.

Please give respect.

Did I convinced you?

Dear Satish,

I will not comment your ideas because you made one crucial mistake in the very beginning. Real GOD cannot be imitated. He is the only Creator! We can made things but cannot create anything in the way He does!

I'm sorry to disappoint you but your artificial god is not a god at all in terms of GOD the Creator...

Regards,

MM

Dear Mihail Motzev ,

regardless to the presented paper's contribution: Did you realize, that the dominant idea about "god" is used as a metaphor in the algorithms? If you do see the use of the idea about "god" as a metaphor, why do you think it is inappropriate to use this metaphor in (computer) science?

Yours,

Dom

Dear Dominik,

You cannot make jokes with GOD. It is not appropriate to use even metaphors about GOD Who created the nature etc. as Satish mentioned in his paper.

Bets,

MM

@Mihail Motzev,

You are definitely correct. My idea was that Scientists are creating Algorithms based on insects, birds, bees, water, flowers, sports etc. When all these Algorithms are giving optimal solution then why not imitate and create Artificial Gods which will give optimal solution. I believe in God and hence showed Research Scientists a new path titled "Artificial God Optimization". I am using the Greatness of God in Algorithms. We have to imitate God as much as possible then we get optimal solutions. You are correct that God is great. I agree.

Dear @Dominik Fischer,

Thanks for supporting my idea. Mihail Motzev doesn't want to imitate God because God is perfect and cannot be imitated. My idea was that when ants, birds, water, chromosomes etc are giving good results then why not create Algorithms based on Artificial Souls, Artificial Gods and Artificial Humans and get even more better results.

Satish Gajawada,

With this clarification I agree with you. Maybe you have to mention it in a few more details in your paper. And about your algorithms I can only say that they are looking good, but my area of expertise is Business Forecasting and Predictive Analytics and I cannot give you more detailed feedback. Best, MM.