I would like to do my PhD on the climate change. If anyone is willing to work with me, we can connect and I can explain the whole theory and then may be we can proceed quantitively to prove my theory is right or wrong.
The present climate change (example: current heat waves) is due to the pollution in the air brought about by burning fossil fuels for over 100 years.
If we start using renewables, like solar energy, instead of fossil fuels, the amount of pollution will be the same for a while, then will be less later on.
With less pollution, we will get less extreme weather events like heat waves.
If you are suggesting that with solar energy will get more pollution in the air, that is not possible.
@MichaelIssigonis Thanks for your response.
firstly, I wanted to apologize for putting the question in a little wrong way. My theory is that using renewable resources actually might end disturbing the cycle of our planet. I believe it is much severe than climate change.
Without the use of renewable energy, the amount of excess greenhouse gas will keep on increasing every year. This will have a severe negative impact. At the end of this century, a lot of coastal people will be relocated due to the increase in sea level. Increased temperature will make some areas unbearable to live in for people who can't afford air conditioning. An increase in temperature and sea level will also result in frequent cyclones and tornados. It will take a huge toll on people's lives and properties. The increased use of fossil fuel is in fact disrupting the natural cycle of the planet. And the use of renewable energy is the only way to stop this.
I think it would be better if you could give key points about your idea.
@Ishtiak Mahmud, So, Here is the key points about my theory.
using renewable resources for energy meaning we extract the natural energy available that runs the planet. This could affect our planet in a more serious way than a using energy from non-renewable energy resources.
Sai Sasanka Grandhi how can we exploit solar energy (renewable resource). It's beyond our capability. We can only use the amount that is available to us naturally. We cant change that. So I would like to politely disagree with your theory.
@SakivaNabi I agree with your answer. With respect to Solar energy we cannot exploit the energy. The Star ultimately dies even if we use or dont use the energy.
however, we dont have ways to properly dispose off the solar panelt which will die after 7 years of usage. This indeed causes more pollution.
However, renewable energy sources also include Wind, Geo thermal, Hydro as well. Clearly, we are exploiting those sources. We cannot disagree on that.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Bioecology
- Systems Ecology
- Landscape Ecology
- Connectivity